Paving The Road To Globalism

UN bankrolls mass migration

Rhoda Wilson

The UN doesn’t merely observe; it bankrolls. Its agencies funnel resources to NGOs that grease the migrant routes into Europe, John Mac Ghlionn writes.

This is the deliberate engineering of demographic decline and political dependency.

John Mac Ghlionn

The phrase “Great Replacement” is almost always dismissed before it’s even spoken. Waved away as racist paranoia, a xenophobic delusion of the “far-right.”

Why though? The replacement is real.

Remove the reflexive accusations, and the picture that emerges is not fantasy but fact. It’s written down, published, and openly promoted. The United Nations’ own 2000 document, blandly titled Replacement Migration*, lays out the plan in technocratic language.

Declining birth rates in the West, ageing populations and the need to “supplement” them with millions upon millions of migrants. They sold it as inevitability. They marketed it as progress and called it compassion.

But the aim was political from the start. Weaken national identity, sever loyalty to sovereign states. Clear the way for rule by supranational managers who answer to no electorate.

As explained by journalist Alex Newman, in the must-watch Epoch Timesdocumentary, ‘Weapons of Mass Migration’:

The objective – the primary objective – is to facilitate massive migratory flows to undermine the sovereignty of the nation-state and … ultimately dismantle the nation-state as a sovereign entity.

Certain parts of northern and western Europe are good examples, where now the native populations are literally in the minority in their own major cities.

When you facilitate these enormous migratory flows, you undermine people’s … attachment to not just their nation, but also their nation-state. And this facilitates the emergence of first regional governance and then global governance, which is the ultimate objective.

This brings us to George Soros. He spelt it out a decade ago: Europe should admit at least a million asylum seekers every single year. Not a ceiling, a floor. This was a plan, discussed openly, praised by the liberal press, and derided only by leaders like Viktor Orbán who dared to call it what it was – an attempt to end Europe’s cultural continuity. 

More...