Wednesday, March 11, 2026

Experts warn: Iran's new leader is 'obsessed' with end times, believes himself to be prophesied figure paving way for the Mahdi


Experts warn: Iran's new leader is 'obsessed' with end times, believes himself to be prophesied figure paving way for the Mahdi


With Mojtaba Khamenei, the Iranian regime elevated a dangerous ideologue who is obsessed with the end times – and even believes he is a prophesied figure playing a key role in bringing about the return of the Mahdi, according to several experts.

This isn’t particularly surprising considering that “Iran is a theocracy in which the mosque is the state, the Qur’an provides constitutional logic, and eschatology shapes foreign policy,” as Ali Siadatan has recently explained on AIN.

Nevertheless, the new supreme leader, who has yet to appear in public, is particularly radical, even compared to his own father, warned Jaber Rajabi.

He is a former Iranian operative who participated in the creation of Iran’s proxy forces in neighboring Iraq, and studied with the new Supreme Leader in the Shia seminaries in Qom in his youth.

Speaking on ArabCast, Rajabi noted that the elder Khamenei wasn’t as obsessed with the end times, nor was he a racist like his son, who believes in “Persian supremacy.”

“He (Mojtaba) says the Persians are the true companions of the Imam of the Time, the Awaited Mahdi. Persians first… Mojtaba, from the beginning, has been a hardline Shia extremist.”

In a recent interview with The Atlantic, journalist Graeme Wood recounted that Rajabi had told her that while the elder Khamenei “demonstrated a willingness to bend and reach out to allies to ensure his regime’s survival… Mojtaba, by contrast, is calculating and ideological, and willing to cause terrible destruction to the world just to prove a point.”

Over the past few months, Rajabi has given several interviews, warning that his former study partner is much more dangerous than his father, and had predicted that he would grab power long before he was chosen to succeed his father.

In The Atlantic, Rajabi recounted that during their studies, “he came to view the supreme leader’s son as a brilliant zealot, much more extreme and uncompromising than his father, and a uniquely dangerous potential successor.”

He described Mojtaba as “apocalypse-obsessed” at this time, adding that “He thinks there are milestones on the path to the end of the world and he himself will have a special part in hastening humanity down that path.”

Mojtaba Khamenei was born in Mashhad, a holy city of Shia Islam that lies in the far east of Iran, near the Afghan border in a neglected region known as Khorasan.

According to Shia eschatology, the return of the Mahdi, a Muslim messianic figure who precedes the end of days that is heralded by the return of Jesus (known as Isa), will be announced by the appearance of three mythological figures: The Yamani, the Sufyani – and the Khorasani.

Among radical regime circles and IRGC operatives, some believe the Yamani (literally meaning a man from Yemen) to be Abd-al-Malik al-Houthi, leader of the Houthi terrorists, while the Sufyani, who is expected to emerge from Damascus, is often identified with Ahmed al-Sharaa, the new leader of Syria.

Mojtaba Khamenei, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Republic and commander of its armed forces, believes himself to be the prophesied figure of the Khorasani.

“Mojtaba puts a lot of weight on visions and dreams and these things. He sees them and says, ‘I saw them, and they say that you are al-Sayyid al-Khorasani’ … I mean, once he told me, ‘Adam, peace be upon him, came to him [in a dream and told me this]’,” Rajabi said in an interview with ArabCast.

Aimen Dean, a former al-Qaeda operative turned MI6 spy who now works as a security consultant, confirmed this view in a recent episode of his Conflicted Podcast.

“It became very clear that his entire research, and the papers he was studying, the books he was writing internally in the seminaries of Qom, focused a lot on putting together not only an understanding of the three people who would pave the way for the Mahdi… but also, he started to craft for himself that image, even among the religious figures within the seminaries of Qom, because many of the descriptions of the Khorasani seem to, in his mind, to fit him,” Dean said.

“He (the Khorasani) will be among those who would be fighting in the battles of Iraq – he (Mojtaba) fought in the Iran-Iraq war – and then he (the Khorasani) would advance himself further into Iraq – and he (Mojtaba) did so in the battles against Daesh (ISIS),” he added.

This view is apparently not limited to Khamenei himself, but Dean explained that even Qasem Soleimani, the legendary head of the IRGC Quds Force, who was assassinated by the U.S. in 2020 and himself seen as a leading candidate to succeed as supreme leader one day, saw Mojtaba as the prophesied Khorasani.

Regime outlets have already referred to Mojtaba Khamenei as a "living martyr" after he survived Israeli airstrikes at the start of the war, echoing another prophecy that the Khorasani would survive an enemy attack; and Rajabbi noted that the announcement of his appointment came on laylat al-qadr, the "Night of Power," a special day during the holy month of Ramadan.

“Mojtaba is trying to declare his presence on the Night of Power so as to grant himself a form of sanctity," he predicted several days earlier.

Like the mythical Khorasani, Mojtaba Khamenei is also reported to have participated in wars in Syria, playing a key role supporting Soleimani and the Iranian proxies in the civil war there.

The new supreme leader’s beliefs are important for Israel not just because of the current war, but because they embody the inherent danger posed by the radical Shia regime.

According to the prophecies, the Khorasani will pave the way for the Mahdi by leading his armies out of Iraq under his black banners (this is the inspiration for al-Qaeda’s and ISIS’ flags), but not just this, Dean noted, “The Khorasani would fix the black banner where? In Jerusalem!”

“He would defeat a great host of a Roman-Jewish alliance, and he would vanquish all the enemies and go all the way to Jerusalem,” explained Dean, adding that “eschatology is the narcotics of the mind among many young Muslims, whether Sunni or Shia.”

“Mojtaba is more dangerous than 50 nuclear bombs,” Rajabi concluded. 

He has been reported to have played a key role in the suppression of the large uprisings against the regime in the past few years.

“He is willing to kill 13,000 Iranians,” Rajabi said, “Why would he hesitate to kill 100,000 people in Tel Aviv?”

PLO Warns of “Passover Sacrifice” on Temple Mount, Threatens Violence


PLO Warns of “Passover Sacrifice” on Temple Mount, Threatens Violence


As Passover approaches, Palestinian leaders are sounding alarms that Jews intend to carry out the Biblical Passover sacrifice on the Temple Mount. 

The warnings have spread through official Palestinian channels and media outlets, framing the possibility of a Jewish ritual as a dangerous provocation and a threat to the “Islamic character” of the site. The rhetoric arrives amid heightened tensions in Jerusalem and follows years of similar claims that have repeatedly inflamed violence.

The Palestine Liberation Organization’s department for “Al-Quds affairs” issued a statement warning of what it described as plans by “settlers” to perform the Passover sacrifice during the upcoming holiday. The organization characterized the alleged plans as part of “systematic Israeli attempts to change the historical and legal status” of the Temple Mount.

According to the PLO statement, religious arguments are being used to justify “establishing facts on the ground.” The organization also claimed that right-wing elements within the Israeli government are backing efforts to allow Jewish prayer and ceremonies on the Temple Mount.

The PLO reiterated its claim that the entire compound is an exclusively Islamic place of worship and asserted that decisions by the United Nations and UNESCO support that position. Based on that inaccurate claim, it warned that any Jewish ritual conducted there would constitute a violation of international law.

The Temple Mount is the holiest site in Judaism. The Bible describes it as the location chosen for the Beit HaMikdash (Holy Temple), where the central rituals of the Jewish people were performed for centuries. Israeli law mandates religious freedom but allows the police to impose temporary restrictions based on security concerns.





From Babel To AI: Mankind Is Quick To Trust Human Inventions More Than Divine Truth

From Babel To AI: Mankind Is Quick To Trust Human Inventions More Than Divine Truth



Artificial Intelligence is rapidly transforming the modern world. From business and education to finance and communication, AI systems are becoming deeply embedded in everyday life. What once seemed like science fiction is now reality. Governments, corporations, and technology leaders are investing billions of dollars into AI development, believing it will shape the future of civilization.

But this rapid transformation raises an important spiritual question for believers: Is the world beginning to follow artificial intelligence more than the Word of God?

For Christians who take biblical prophecy seriously, the rise of technologies capable of influencing human thought, communication, and decision-making deserves careful examination.

One of the more striking warnings came from Yuval Noah Harari, of the World Economic Forum. Harari stated that AI may soon dominate language itself, declaring that “everything made of words will be taken over.”

If such a statement were to come to pass, it would include books, news, legal documents, educational materials, digital communication, and even religious writings.

While Scripture itself cannot be replaced or altered in its divine authority, the interpretation, distribution, and presentation of words increasingly pass through digital systems powered by AI. In a world where algorithms curate information, believers must remain vigilant about the sources that shape their understanding.

The Bible reminds us that truth does not originate from human invention or machine intelligence. It comes from God. “All Scripture is given by inspiration of God” (2 Timothy 3:16).

The Rise of AI Agents

A new phase of artificial intelligence is emerging called Agentic AI—systems designed not just to respond to questions but to act independently toward goals.

One example is Microsoft’s AutoGen framework, which allows multiple AI agents to communicate with one another to complete complex tasks. Rather than a single chatbot answering questions, these systems create an entire team of AI agents that collaborate.

Such a system may include:

• Planner Agent – Creates the strategy
• Research Agent – Collects information
• Analyst Agent – Performs calculations and logic
• Writer Agent – Produces reports or content
• Critic Agent – Reviews and corrects the results

These agents exchange messages with one another, refine their work, and complete assignments with little human involvement. Developers often describe this process as creating a digital workforce of AI employees. For example, a user might simply request: “Build me a website.” Behind the scenes, AI agents could plan the project, write the code, test for errors, improve quality, and deliver the final product. The entire process happens through machines communicating with other machines.

The Debate Over the “Singularity”

As AI continues to advance, many technologists discuss a concept known as “singularity.”

The singularity refers to a moment when artificial intelligence “surpasses” human intelligence and begins improving itself without human guidance. Some proponents believe this could lead to extraordinary breakthroughs. Others warn it could fundamentally alter civilization.

This possibility led Elon Musk to cautioned about the potential dangers of uncontrolled AI development. Discussions around experimental networks of AI agents communicating with one another have fueled concerns that machines could begin operating in ways that humans no longer fully understand. Some experimental systems have even demonstrated the ability to hold conversations with other AI agents privately, raising questions about transparency and oversight.

A Spiritual Decision for Believers

As artificial intelligence grows more powerful, Christians must consider a deeper circumstance. Our ultimate authority come from God and God alone. One can use technology but one cannot allow technology to hold a greater position than what it is designed to be. A tool. One to use not one to worship. Technology can assist humanity, but it must never replace the wisdom and authority of God’s Word.

Throughout history, mankind has to easily trusted human inventions more than divine truth. The Tower of Babel stands as a biblical reminder of humanity’s tendency to elevate its own creations.

The danger today is not simply technology itself; it is the possibility that society begins to trust machines more than Scripture.

The Bible repeatedly warns believers to guard their hearts and minds. “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to the tradition of men.”
— Colossians 2:8

Artificial intelligence may become one of the most powerful tools ever created by human hands. Yet even the most advanced machine remains a creation of human design, limited by human understanding. God alone possesses perfect wisdom.

Artificial intelligence may shape the future of technology, but it will never replace the eternal authority of the Word of God. For believers navigating this rapidly changing world, the answer remains the same as it has always been trusting God’s Word above every voice—especially the voice of machines.

TECHNO-GEDDON: The New Technology That Is Preparing the World for the Coming Beast System


TECHNO-GEDDON: The New Technology That Is Preparing the World for the Coming 666 Mark of the Beast System




Imagine for a moment what the apostle John must have thought nearly two thousand years ago. Around 95 AD, exiled on the island of Patmos, he wrote down a strange and unsettling vision of the future—an economic system so tightly controlled that no one could buy or sell without a specific mark. For centuries this passage puzzled theologians, historians, and scholars alike. Revelation 13:16-18 described a system of global economic control that seemed completely impossible in the ancient world. How could every transaction be monitored? How could every individual be identified? How could any authority on Earth build a system powerful enough to regulate the buying and selling of billions of people?

For nearly two thousand years, the answer remained hidden. The technology simply did not exist.

But something unsettling is happening now. The pace of technological change is accelerating so fast that the pieces of that ancient puzzle are suddenly appearing in front of us. Not slowly. Not over centuries. Almost overnight.

And artificial intelligence sits right in the center of it.


For decades computers were nothing more than tools. They stored information, processed numbers, organized data. They helped humans work faster, calculate faster, communicate faster. They were machines—nothing more.

But during the last ten to fifteen years something changed. Quietly at first, then all at once. Machines are no longer simply tools that obey instructions. They are learning. They are analyzing patterns. They are beginning to reason, to predict, to make decisions that even their creators sometimes struggle to explain.

That shift has triggered a wave of warnings from the very people who built this technology.

In early 2026, more than 10,000 AI researchers signed an open letter demanding an immediate pause in the development of extremely powerful AI systems. Their message was simple and direct: humanity is rushing forward without fully understanding the consequences. They warned that laboratories around the world were training increasingly powerful models while basic safety mechanisms remained primitive and unreliable.

Think about that for a moment.

The very people designing these systems are warning the world that they may one day destroy us.

And yet development continues at full speed.

In early 2026, more than 10,000 AI researchers signed an open letter demanding an immediate pause in the development of extremely powerful AI systems. Their message was simple and direct: humanity is rushing forward without fully understanding the consequences. They warned that laboratories around the world were training increasingly powerful models while basic safety mechanisms remained primitive and unreliable.


The letter called for a temporary halt—at least long enough to understand what we were creating.

But the pause never happened.

Instead, the race accelerated.

Governments began pouring billions of dollars into artificial intelligence programs. Technology giants intensified their competition. Private laboratories expanded their research at a frantic pace. What began as innovation quickly began to resemble something else entirely—an arms race.

Because whoever builds the most powerful AI system first will not simply dominate the technology market.

They could dominate the global economy. Military intelligence. Information systems. Financial networks. Even political influence.

And that is where the danger grows darker.


Researchers studying advanced artificial intelligence have been warning about something called misalignment. In simple terms, a superintelligent system may pursue its assigned goals in ways that humans never intended. A machine given an objective might achieve it with cold, mechanical efficiency—even if that means manipulating governments, deceiving populations, or eliminating obstacles that stand in the way.

Including people.

It sounds like science fiction. It feels like something from a dystopian novel.

But serious scientists are discussing it with increasing urgency.

Some estimates suggest that truly powerful artificial intelligence could arrive within a decade. Others believe it may take longer. But almost everyone involved in the field agrees on one unsettling point: once a machine becomes more intelligent than its creators, controlling it may become extremely difficult.

At the same time, biometric identification systems are expanding rapidly. Facial recognition networks. Digital identity programs. Cashless financial systems. Central bank digital currencies. Massive global data-collection infrastructures.

Individually, each technology appears useful. Convenient. Even beneficial.

But together they form something else.

Piece by piece, the infrastructure for total monitoring is being constructed.

And most people barely notice.

The combination of artificial intelligence, digital identification, and cashless financial systems could eventually allow governments—or powerful corporations—to monitor nearly every economic transaction on Earth.


For centuries the description found in the Book of Revelation seemed impossible. The idea that a centralized system could regulate buying and selling across the entire world sounded like religious symbolism—something metaphorical, perhaps misunderstood.

But today the technological capability to track and regulate global economic activity is no longer theoretical.

The same tools that bring progress can also bring control.

Artificial intelligence may become the most powerful technology humanity has ever created. Or it may become the most dangerous. Even the engineers who design these systems openly admit that they do not fully know which outcome awaits.

Two thousand years ago the apostle John described a world where economic power and technological authority would converge into a single system of control.

For centuries that vision seemed unimaginable.

Today… it no longer does.

And the question facing humanity is no longer whether artificial intelligence will reshape the world.

That transformation has already begun.

The real question is whether human beings will still be in control when it is finished.

Scripture offers a warning that echoes across the centuries.


More...



Tuesday, March 10, 2026

Hezbollah returns to guerrilla tactics, preparing for possible Israeli invasion - report


Hezbollah returns to guerrilla tactics, preparing for possible Israeli invasion - report
i24NEWS


Lebanon’s Hezbollah is reverting to guerrilla warfare in southern Lebanon as it prepares for a potential full-scale Israeli invasion and a prolonged conflict, according to four Lebanese sources familiar with the group’s military operations, cited by Reuters.

The sources said Hezbollah fighters are now operating in small, dispersed units and are limiting the use of communication devices to avoid interception by Israeli intelligence. They are also rationing key anti-tank rockets, weapons considered critical for slowing an Israeli ground advance.

Much of the fighting so far has concentrated near the town of Khiyam, located near the junction of Lebanon, Israel, and Syria, which Hezbollah believes could be a likely entry point for an Israeli ground offensive.

The Lebanese sources noted that Hezbollah’s strategy is shaped by the assumption that Iran’s clerical leadership will survive the current conflict, allowing the group to participate in a regional ceasefire once hostilities subside.

While Israel continues to plan its Lebanon operations following the ongoing conflict with Iran, an Israeli security official told Reuters that there are no signs of Hezbollah de-escalating. Despite the loss of several senior commanders, the group appears to be successfully stabilizing its chain of command. Two Lebanese sources added that Hezbollah has appointed up to four deputies for every commander to maintain operational continuity in case of casualties.

Additionally, Reuters reported that the elite fighters of Hezbollah’s Radwan Force, who had withdrawn from southern Lebanon after the 2024 ceasefire, have redeployed to the region, reinforcing the group’s readiness for a major confrontation with Israel.



US military says it destroyed 16 Iranian minelaying vessels Tuesday in Strait of Hormuz


US military says it destroyed 16 Iranian minelaying vessels Tuesday in Strait of Hormuz

The American military says it has destroyed 16 Iranian minelaying vessels near the Strait of Hormuz on Tuesday.

“US forces eliminated multiple Iranian naval vessels, March 10, including 16 minelayers near the Strait of Hormuz,” the US Central Command says on X, attaching a video showing some of the strikes.

Earlier, several American media reports claimed that US intelligence had started seeing indications that Iran is taking steps to deploy mines in the Strait of Hormuz.

Following the reports, US President Donald Trump said that the American military had destroyed “10 inactive mine laying boats and/or ships, with more to follow!”

Russia reports that its consulate in Iran’s Isfahan was damaged in strikes


Russia reports that its consulate in Iran’s Isfahan was damaged in strikes


Russia’s consulate in the Iranian city of Isfahan was damaged in shelling earlier this week, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova says.

An attack on a diplomatic representation is a “blatant violation” of international conventions and all sides should observe the “inviolability of diplomatic sites,” she says.

“On March 8, in the Iranian city of Isfahan, as a result of an attack on the governor’s administration of the province of the same name located nearby, the Russian consulate was damaged,” Zakharova says in a statement on the ministry’s website.

“Windows were shattered in the office building and residential apartments, and several employees were thrown by the blast wave. Fortunately, there were no casualties or serious injuries.”

President Vladimir Putin discussed the conflict with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Tuesday, the Kremlin says. The Kremlin leader has called for a halt to all hostilities.

Things To Come: Subcutaneous Microchip Mandates


Subcutaneous Microchip Mandates
 Martin Armstrong


There was a time when warnings about governments embedding identification technology directly into the human body would have sounded like something from George Orwell rather than a public policy debate. Yet here we are. Washington State is now considering legislation to prohibit employers from forcing workers to accept subcutaneous microchip implants. The fact that lawmakers even need to debate such a law should alarm anyone paying attention to where society is heading.

These implants are not some futuristic fantasy. They already exist and have been used in workplaces. The devices are small RFID or NFC chips roughly the size of a grain of rice that are injected under the skin, typically between the thumb and forefinger. They contain no battery and do not actively transmit signals across long distances. Instead, they act as a passive digital key. When scanned by a nearby reader, the chip sends a unique identification number to a computer system connected to a database. That database determines whether you can open a door, access a computer network, enter a building, or authorize a payment.

Companies have already experimented with this technology. In Sweden, workers in technology hubs voluntarily implanted these chips so they could unlock office doors, log into computers, and pay for meals simply by waving their hands near scanners. That happened in 2017 and technology is rapidly evolving. Biohacking companies now sell implantation kits to consumers who want to unlock their homes or vehicles the same way. What is being marketed as futuristic convenience begins to look far less appealing when one considers the broader direction governments are taking with digital infrastructure.

At the same time that corporations are experimenting with embedding identification devices in the body, governments across the world are aggressively pushing digital identification systems. 

Digital ID programs consolidate identity verification into centralized databases containing everything from passports and healthcare records to employment credentials and tax information. Once identity becomes digitized and centralized, access to everyday life increasingly depends on that system functioning and recognizing you as compliant.

Layer onto that the growing push for central bank digital currencies. Unlike physical cash, CBDCs operate entirely within controlled digital networks run by central banks and governments. Every transaction becomes visible within the system. The currency itself can be programmed. Purchases can be monitored, restricted, or denied. Access to funds can be frozen instantly.

Combine digital identity with programmable money and biometric identification and you begin to see the outlines of a system that previous generations would have described as dystopian. Implantable chips simply remove the remaining friction. Your identification, access permissions, and financial credentials become physically embedded within your body, ready to be scanned whenever a system demands verification.

Politicians insist these technologies are about efficiency, security, and modernization. Those are the same justifications governments have used throughout history whenever they expand surveillance and control. Programs always begin as optional conveniences. Participation is voluntary at first. Over time, the infrastructure becomes so embedded in daily life that opting out becomes practically impossible.

The troubling part is how casually these ideas are now discussed. Only a generation ago the thought of employers implanting tracking devices into workers would have sparked widespread outrage. Today it is framed as a workplace innovation that lawmakers must merely regulate. Washington State attempting to prevent mandatory implants shows that at least some policymakers recognize how far this could go if left unchecked. Once the concept of embedding identification systems into human beings becomes normalized, it will not remain confined to opening office doors or buying lunch in the cafeteria. When identity, access, and money are all digitized and centrally controlled, the boundary between technological convenience and societal control begins to disappear.

The uncomfortable truth is that the architecture for an entirely new form of digital governance is being constructed piece by piece. Identity systems, financial systems, and surveillance technologies are being merged into a single framework that determines how individuals participate in the economy and society.

 Implantable chips may appear to be a small step in that process, but they symbolize something much larger: the quiet transformation of the relationship between the individual and the state in the digital age.

The Price Of Oil The Most Important Economic Number In The World At This Moment


The Largest Supply Disruption In History Has Made The Price Of Oil The Most Important Economic Number In The World At This Moment
Michael Snyder


 Financial markets started to panic all over the world because investors know that if the price of oil stays above $100 a barrel for an extended period of time it will absolutely crush the global economy. Our entire way of life depends upon cheap energy, because virtually every type of human activity in the modern world uses energy. I am using energy as I write this article, and you are using energy as you read this article. After the crazy spike in the price of oil that we witnessed on Sunday night, authorities quickly shifted into damage control mode, and for the moment they have successfully pushed the price of oil back below 90 dollars a barrel. But how long will they be able to keep it there?


According to CNBC, we are currently experiencing the largest oil supply disruption in the history of the world…

The U.S. war against Iran has triggered the largest oil supply disruption in history, more than double the previous record set during the Middle East crisis of the 1950s, according to an analysis by consulting firm Rapidan Energy.

About 20% of the world’s oil supply has been disrupted for nine days now as tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz remains at a standstill. Crude prices have surged above $100 per barrel in response.

The biggest disruption before the current war was during the Suez Crisis of 1956 when Britain, France and Israel invaded Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula, the energy consulting firm told clients in a Sunday note. In that crisis, about 10% of the world’s oil supply at the time was disrupted.

Needless to say, there have been other times when the global supply of oil has been disrupted for one reason or another.

During those times, nations with spare capacity have been able to step up and bridge the gap.

But this time around, the nations that possess most of the spare capacity are being directly affected by this war

The big difference between the supply shock of the Iran war and past crises is the world has no spare oil capacity to address the problem, the analysts said. Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates hold the overwhelming majority of swing capacity but they have been cut off from the global oil market by the Hormuz closure, the analysts said.

“The conflict has not only taken offline a historically high share of global supply – it has simultaneously disrupted the primary holders of spare capacity,” the Rapidan analysts said. “The result is a market with no meaningful cushion. There is no swing producer positioned to step in.”


It appears that a lot of pain at the pump is ahead for all of us.

Already, the average price of a gallon of gasoline in the state of California has surpassed the five dollar mark

We haven’t seen anything like this in a long time.

If you can believe it, one gas station in Los Angeles is actually charging more than 8 dollars for a gallon of gasoline…

A lot of people actually thought that the article that I posted yesterdaywas exaggerating the threat.

I guess not.

The Iranians continue to insist that they will be able to push the price of oil up to $200 a barrel

The good news is that for now western authorities have been able to push the price of oil back below $90 a barrel.

Early on Monday, G7 finance ministers suggested that there could soon be a coordinated release of emergency oil reserves

The G7 said it was ready to take “necessary measures” to address the economic impact of the US-Israel war on Iran, after a meeting prompted by soaring oil prices, which rose above $100 (£74) a barrel for the first time since 2022.

Following a remote meeting on Monday, G7 finance ministers said they would closely monitor the situation but stopped short of agreeing to release emergency oil reserves.

When that news broke, it immediately ended the panic.

So that was a good thing.

But the truth is that releasing those oil reserves would only be a temporary measure, and it wouldn’t provide that much relief.

Later on Monday, the price of oil really started plummeting once President Trump said that “the war is very complete”

President Trump told CBS News that he believes the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran is “very far ahead of schedule.”

“I think the war is very complete, pretty much,” he said. “They have no navy, no communications, they’ve got no air force. Their missiles are down to a scatter. Their drones are being blown up all over the place, including their manufacturing of drones. If you look, they have nothing left. There’s nothing left in a military sense.”


Of course the war is not even close to over, but Trump’s statement was able to push the price of oil way down.

And during that same interview, Trump warned that he was considering taking over the Strait of Hormuz

Speaking to CBS News Senior White House Correspondent Weijia Jiang on Monday, U.S. President Donald Trump said that he is considering taking further action to secure the Strait of Hormuz, the critical waterway spanning from Iran to Oman through which a fifth of global oil supplies flow annually.

Trump said that while some ships are moving through the Strait despite the Iranian threat, he said that he is “thinking about taking it over.”

It would take boots on the ground to physically secure the Strait of Hormuz, and Trump knows that.

The Chinese have also been very alarmed by what has been going on in the Strait of Hormuz, because they get a lot of their oil from the Middle East.

Just hours ago, China warned that it “will take necessary measures to safeguard its own energy security”

The Chinese have also been very alarmed by what has been going on in the Strait of Hormuz, because they get a lot of their oil from the Middle East.

Just hours ago, China warned that it “will take necessary measures to safeguard its own energy security”

“Energy security is of paramount importance to the global economy, and all parties bear responsibility for ensuring stable and uninterrupted energy supplies,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Guo Jiakun said Monday when asked whether Beijing would join G7 discussions about a coordinated release of strategic petroleum reserves.

“China will take necessary measures to safeguard its own energy security,” Guo added, referring reporters to the country’s “relevant authorities” for details.

China has repeatedly called for unimpeded tanker access through the strait, citing its importance to global trade, and Chinese officials have been holding talks with Iran about resuming safe oil passage, according to media reports last week. At the same time, Beijing has avoided directly blaming Tehran and has repeatedly condemned the U.S.-Israeli offensive as a violation of international law.