Thursday, February 10, 2022

Escalation On The War On Free Speech:

EXTREMELY URGENT: The U.S. Administration says I’m a terrorist threat.




The White House has begun an extraordinary assault on free speech in America. It is no longer content merely to force social media companies to suppress dissenting views. It appears to be setting the stage to use federal police powers.

How else to read the “National Terrorism Advisory System Bulletin” the Department of Homeland Security issued on Monday? Its first sentence:

SUMMARY OF THE TERRORISM THREAT TO THE UNITED STATES: The United States remains in a heightened threat environment fueled by several factors, including an online environment filled with false or misleading narratives and conspiracy theories..[emphasis added]

You read those words right.

The government now says “misleading narratives” are the most dangerous contributor to terrorism against the United States.

The bulletin’s next sentence:

These threat actors seek to exacerbate societal friction to sow discord and undermine public trust in government institutions to encourage unrest, which could potentially inspire acts of violence. [emphasis added]

You read those words right too.

A federal agency says that to “undermine public trust in government institutions” is now considered terrorism. Speech doesn’t even have to encourage rebellion or violence generally, much less against anyone specific. It just has to “potentially inspire” violence.

Potentially.

Later, the bulletin explains exactly what speech the government now considers a terrorist danger:

Widespread online proliferation of false or misleading narratives regarding unsubstantiated widespread election fraud and COVID-19.

There’s that word misleading again.

Who’s defining “misleading”? Misleading to whom? Misleading how?

I have no doubt whatsoever that I fit as a terrorist threat under these guidelines.

So does Joe Rogan. And Tucker Carlson. After all, we’ve “undermine[d] public trust in government institutions” about Covid and the mRNA shots (I try not to call them vaccines anymore).

This bulletin marks an extraordinary escalation of the war on speech and the First Amendment.

The Biden Administration has issued five bulletins since it assumed power. Regularly issuing these warnings at all is problematic – they are not “alerts” to warn people about specific and ongoing terrorist plots. Thus they inevitably contain political judgment about what future threats may be the most severe.

But none of the earlier reports contained language remotely similar to Monday’s.

The original January 2021 bulletin highlighted “ideologically-motivated violent extremists” and specific threats of violence against “critical infrastructure.” The fourth discussed how foreign and domestic extremists were trying “to inspire potential followers to conduct attacks in the United States, including by exploiting recent events in Afghanistan.” It added “that as of November 10, 2021, DHS is not aware of an imminent and credible threat.”

In contrast, Monday’s bulletin clearly equates speech with terroristic activity. That connection may seem ridiculous and absurd. It is not.

These public statements are not merely wallpaper. They can reflect secret government decisions about what police or intelligence tactics are acceptable against targeted groups.

This is not a conspiracy theory; in 2017, Central Intelligence Agency director Mike Pompeo publicly called Wikileaks a “non-state hostile intelligence service.” As Yahoo News reported three years later:

More than just a provocative talking point, the designation opened the door for agency operatives to take far more aggressive actions, treating the organization as it does adversary spy services.

What, if anything, are government agencies planning to do about the terrorist threat that I and other Covid skeptics represent? I have no idea.

But make no mistake. This bulletin marks a clear escalation of the targeting from the highest levels of the federal government that began last year.

Remember: in July President Biden, Jennifer Psaki, and Surgeon General Vivek Murthy all encouraged social media companies to clamp down on Covid vaccine skeptics less than 24 hours before Twitter began the process of deplatforming me. Last week Psaki specifically targeted Rogan, who has a much larger audience.




1 comment:

Anonymous said...

"Potentially" is not in alignment with American's found innocent till proven guilty under Constitutional Laws when speech freely expresses the need to demand Agencies remain honest from those abusing their power, breaking our known laws, reminding them, your working for US, agreed!! When the system communicates by changing words meanings, they actually sound dumber than a box of rocks; Terrorism comes from bullying power surges in forms Article describes, those trying to turn the tablets on free speaking American's are committing crimes, and practicing Communism in our USA, in my opinion. Everyone needs those doing so to resign, and American's to do what they always have done, be free to question stupidity taking on a form of evil IMO

Threats against Free Speech, Freedoms, coated with Gov. censorship, propaganda, and now Police State determining ways to silence OUR stance for laws to work against our oppressor's, and silencing our voices to speak truths to power??

No way should the masses bow down to the wrongs and remember what happened when people did so during Hitler's Reign, during CCP's take over, and Russia's intense propaganda to subvert the will of their populace, those examples speak volumes, IMO!

Majority of American Citizen's worship GOD, not any broken, corrupted Government, in my opinion! Therefore change must occur starting with discussions from free speech, enforce term limits, transparency for Federal spending, and putting in folks that share the American Dream guided by God! Prayer's for Freedom to Ring!!!