- Seven applicants, on behalf of the British population, have filed a complaint with the International Criminal Court (ICC), accusing 16 individuals of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression.
- The 16 defendants include Dr. Anthony Fauci, Dr. Peter Daszak, Bill and Melinda Gates, the CEOs of Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson along with several other British authorities, as well as the presidents of the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Economic Forum.
- According to the ICC complaint, the 16 defendants have violated the Nuremberg Code and Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21 and 53 of the Rome Statute
- The Nuremberg Code is a set of medical research ethics principles that grew out of the “Doctors Trial” in Nuremberg following World War II. The war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg established 10 standards to which doctors must conform when performing experiments on human subjects
- The ICC is a permanent, independent court that investigates crimes that concern the international community. Its activities are governed by an international treaty called the Rome Statute, which has been ratified by more than 120 countries, including the U.S. It can step in when a member state fails to take appropriate action to bring a criminal to justice. In theory, member states are supposed to cooperate with the court
According to The Desert Review, a slew of high-power figures in the COVID-19 pandemic and the push to mandate experimental COVID jabs have been accused of several crimes, including crimes against humanity, war crimes and crimes of aggression in the U.K.:1
“In a stunning 46-page legal filing2 to the International Criminal Court on December 6 [2021], an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.”
In all, the 16 defendants named in the legal filing are:
- Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the NIAID
- Dr. Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance
- Bill Gates
- Melinda Gates
- Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
- Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
- Pascal Soriot, CEO of AstraZeneca
- Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson & Johnson
- Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, director-general of the WHO
- Boris Johnson, U.K. prime minister
- Christopher Whitty, U.K. chief medical adviser
- Matthew Hancock, former U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
- Medicines and Healthcare, current U.K. secretary of state for Health and Social Care
- June Raine, U.K. chief executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
- Dr. Rajiv Shah, president of the Rockefeller Foundation
- Klaus Schwab, president of the World Economic Forum
Meryl has posted her side of the story here. It’s worth a read so you can see how corrupt the system is. Their accusations are outrageous and she’s courageous.
They are trying to silence Meryl Nass because they don’t like people who refuse to blindly follow CDC guidance
The Board concludes that the continued ability of Dr. Nass to practice as a physician in the State of Maine constitutes an immediate jeopardy to the health and physical safety of the public who might receive her medical services, and that it is necessary to immediately suspend her ability to practice medicine in order to adequately respond to this risk.
That’s interesting. It’s in sharp contrast with what Dr. Robert Malone wrote me:
Dr. Nass is guilty of prescribing FDA-approved drugs that have been shown in dozens of trials to be beneficial in treating COVID:
- Prescribing ivermectin (has multiple peer-reviewed meta-analysis and systematic reviews, the highest level of evidence-based medicine)
- Prescribing hydroxychloroquine (the Boulware trial which I funded found that HCQ was effective and a subsequent analysis by David Wiseman showed the effect was statistically significant).
Here’s the interesting thing: had she prescribed nothing for these patients, she wouldn’t have been cited.
She was accused of posting a message on Twitter linking to an article by Dr. Mercola.
She was also accused of making the following comments, all of which are true AFAIK. Do you see any errors?
she “did not intend to comply with masking and vaccine orders”;b) that the federal government “won’t let us find out” how many people are immune from less severe or asymptomatic COVID cases and the federal government has “basically prohibited the use of normal tests of immunity, normal antibody, T-cell tests, etc., or some pattern of those”, and “instead we all have to be vaccinated” and that “doesn’t make scientific or medical sense”;c) “the more doses of vaccine, the more shots you get the greater the risk of adverse reactions”;
d) “if you’re going to get myocarditis over 80% get it after the second dose, not after the first dose” and “people who got it after the first dose, many of them had already been infected with COVID”;
e) “if we are doing this for people’s health it would be very important to identify how many people are immune and they don’t have to worry about masks … they don’t have to worry about distancing, they don’t have to worry about vaccination. They are immune. We know so far that those people have broad and very durable long-term immunity. As best we know … they’re very immune a year after they had the infection”;
No comments:
Post a Comment