SCOTUS 'Won't Even Consider' Pennsylvania Case Until After Jan 6
National File has learned that the Supreme Court will not even consider hearing the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania case until after the January 6 Electoral College confirmation.
Attorney David Carroll, who filed an amicus briefalongside attorneys representing President Donald Trump in the state of Pennsylvania, tells National File that the Supreme Court docket indicates the court will not consider whether to hear President Trump’s case in Pennsylvania until after the January 6 deadline.
“As I understand the entry,” Carroll told National File, “The Supremes won’t even consider the Pennsylvania case until after the electoral votes are counted (and debated) on January 6.”
This underscores the potential importance of the Electoral College battle currently being planned by Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), who is also working on a related letter calling for Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) to launch an immediate Congressional hearing into election integrity.Thus far, Brooks is joined by 18 other Republican House Representatives in his letter.
Many of these Republicans have also indicated they will back Brooks’ objections on January 6. If one Senate Republican joins Brooks’ objection during the January 6 joint session of Congress, presided by Vice President Mike Pence, then both legislative bodies will break to examine any evidence suggesting individual states should be disqualified.
Earlier this week we told you that the Arizona Senate was issuing subpoenas for the Dominion voting machines in Maricopa county. That happened, but the Maricopa Board of Supervisors is refusing to comply with the subpoena and is filing a complaint to contest the subpoena instead:
In the video, the vice chairman makes a motion to authorize the county attorney to respond to the subpoena with a complaint in Superior Court, and that motion is quickly seconded and the motion is passed.
The Senate will be getting a letter from the county attorney, but no Dominion voting machines. Which would seem to speak volumes about the data on those machines.
Meanwhile, I’m sure the machines themselves are getting a good scrubbing.
How many more different layers of corruption do the American people have to endure before their President is rightfully recognized as the winner of the 2020 election?
Sidney Powell, the blessed attorney who is fighting for our President, tweeted that the Supreme Court is now delaying our (America’s) cases in swing states that need to be heard. These cases show the corruption and the magnitude of the efforts to steal the election from President Trump.
These cases should have the highest priority. Americans want justice and will not stand for a stolen election. We will not agree to a communist takeover of America.
But for some reason, the Supreme Court is delaying cases from being heard related to the election steal. To date, the courts have heard no cases related to the greatest election theft and fraud in world history.
But it’s not just the US Supreme Court.
On Friday night Georgia Republican Party Chairman David Shafer posted a string of tweets calling out the Georgia Supreme Court for slow-walking President Trump’s critical case on voter fraud.
David Shafer: President Donald Trump and I filed an election contest on December 4 showing that thousand of voters were unlawfully cast and counted in the 2020 general election in Georgia. Two weeks later and the lawsuit has yet to be assigned to a judge who is authorized to decide it. We asked the Georgia Supreme Court to intervene when it became apparent that a judge would not be assigned to the case prior to the meeting of the Electoral College. It declined to do so. There is something fundamentally wrong with a system that does not allow for election contests to be timely heard and decided on their merits.
After the forensic examination of 16 Dominion Voting machines in Antrim, Co., MI, Allied Security Operations Group has concluded that the Dominion Voting machines were assigned a 68.05% error rate.
Two weeks ago, Michigan 13th Circuit Court Judge Kevin A Elsenheimer agreed to allow Mr. DePerno’s client, William Bailey, and a highly skilled team of IT experts to perform a forensic examination on 16 of the Dominion voting machines in Antrim County.
On Monday, Judge Elsenheimer agreed to allow the results of the forensic examination to be released to the public. The results were damning.
The allowable election error rate established by the Federal Election Commission guidelines is 1 in 250,000 ballots or .0008%.
Based on the Allied Security Operations report, Constitutional Attorney Matthew DePerno states: “we conclude that The Dominion Voting System should not be used in Michigan. We further conclude that the results of Antrim County should not have been certified.”
No comments:
Post a Comment