The Financial Jigsaw Part 2 – Chapter 7, this week explores the pros and cons of global government which the UN is promoting enthusiastically as covered by BOOM this week. It is impossible for me to see this project as anything other than political and I trust that the arguments presented will encourage further debate and critical thinking
A single world government is not what is unfolding but rather a complexity of aligned institutions, NGOs, corporate networks, interlinked central banking, and corrupt political systems which have been given the imagined name of a bricolage by international relations theorists as they contemplate the macro divisions of the world into three classes. There is no centre, but rather a vast and nebulous interlinked conglomeration.
This does not mean that global government (or ‘global governance’) is emerging organically. It is being purposively directed and is something that the globalist participants openly discuss but hide their plans in plain sight. This has been advancing for a long time.
In the early 1990s, when the Cold War had drawn to a close, the UN convened something called the ‘Commission on Global Governance’, which released a final report called ‘Our Global Neighbourhood‘ in 1995. It makes for fascinating reading as a kind of ‘playbook’ for what followed in the 30 years afterward, thus establishing a clear rhetorical and argumentative pattern in favour of the global governance project that is in play today on the Global Chessboard.
The basic idea is as follows. In the olden days, when “faith in the ability of Governments to protect citizens and improve their lives was strong”, it was fine for the nation-state to be ‘dominant’. But now the world economy is integrated, the global capital market has vastly expanded, there was an extraordinary industrial and agricultural growth together with a huge population explosion; it is now a “more crowded, interdependent world with finite resources.”.
And this means “a new vision for humanity” which will “galvanise people everywhere to achieve higher levels of cooperation in areas of common concern and shared destiny” (these “areas of common concern” being “human rights, equity, democracy, meeting basic material needs, environmental protection, and demilitarisation”), the UN says: We need, in short, “an agreed global framework for actions and policies to be carried out at appropriate levels” and a “multifaceted strategy for global governance”.
This is not difficult reasoning to parse. The central argument can be summarised as: global governance is necessary because the world is globalising, and that brings with it global problems that need solving collectively. And the logic must be impeccable in the minds of those who are engaged in the global governance project, because what they say has remained essentially the same ever since.
Thus from 1995 to 2024, world leaders finalised a revised draft of UN Secretary-General António Guterres’s proposed ‘Pact for the Future’, a memorandum of guiding principles for global governance which is the culmination of his ‘Our Common Agenda‘ project, launched in 2021. While there is a bit more meat on the bone in this document than there was in Our Global Neighbourhood in terms of policy, there is a more-or-less identical argument playing out.
Once again, this document claims: “a time of profound global transformation” in which challenges are “deeply interconnected” and “far exceed the capacity of any single state alone”. Since these problems can “only be addressed collectively” therefore there is a need for “strong and sustained international cooperation guided by trust and solidarity.”
No comments:
Post a Comment