But therein lies the rub: Central banks are also owned and controlled by central governments, and that’s not the only complaint about them. One of the main concerns is that they could potentially disintermediate commercial banks, leading to a significant restructuring of the financial system. There are also concerns around financial stability and privacy, as CBDCs could potentially be used to facilitate money laundering and illicit activities, not to mention provide hackers with a bevy of personal financial information.
Nevertheless, this is what the power elite want so that is what they will push for. Reclaim the Net warns that the following talking points will be utilized to ‘convince’ us that central control over all our money (and making it digital, meaning it can’t be physically held and counted) is for our own good:
Talking Point 1: CBDCs will protect you from social media bank runs
Within days of Silicon Valley Bank’s failure, it was described as the “first social-media fueled bank run in history” and fears about “social media disinfo” started to be stoked.
“Governments are likely to seize upon and amplify these fears of social media bank runs as they push new regulations and proposals in the wake of the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. And they’re likely to position CBDCs as the solution,” the report said.
Talking Point 2: CBDCs will provide financial stability
As Silicon Valley Bank collapsed, the prospect of widespread financial contagion event loomed. Companies said they were left unable to pay staff, large online platforms delayed payments to sellers, and other companies revealed that they held significant portions of their cash at Silicon Valley Bank.
“Get ready for governments to capitalize on the fear of financial instability and use this narrative to push new rules and regulations that will supposedly provide financial stability. They’ll likely blame banks for creating financial blowups, insist that governments need more control over the financial system, and present CBDCs as the tool that will bring financial stability,” the report said.
Keep in mind that Congress passed, and Barack Obama signed major financial regulation legislation following the last major market and banking collapse — the Great Recession of 2008. We were told then that the new rules were needed to prevent the sort of bank runs and collapses we’re once again seeing.
Talking Point 3: CBDCs should be used for customer deposit protection
Many governments have already cited making direct payments to citizens as one of the main use cases for a CBDC. If more banks fail, expect governments to start increasingly focusing on CBDCs as a solution for affected customers.
No comments:
Post a Comment