Thursday, July 30, 2015

Creeping Totalitarianism: The War On Suburbia, UN: Gov't Must Control Private Schools Because Of 'Human Rights'




Hundreds Of Documents Have Been Seized And They Reveal That Turkey Is Most definitely Working With ISIS In Killing Christians


Hundreds of documents have been seized and they reveal that Turkey most definitely has been working with ISIS in killing Christians. According to the report:

A senior Western official claimed that information gathered at the compound of Abu Sayyaf, the individual responsible for oil smuggling operations on behalf of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) who was killed in a US commando operation a few months ago, points to high-level contacts between Turkish officials and leading ISIL members, the Guardian newspaper in the UK has recently reported.

The recent revelation appears to be the first public criticism of Turkey’s approach and could complicate Ankara’s relations with its Western allies.

One senior Western official familiar with the intelligence found at the compound told the Guardian that “direct dealings between Turkish officials and ranking Isis [ISIL] members was now ‘undeniable.'”

The Guardian report continues: “‘There are hundreds of flash drives and documents that were seized there,’ the official told the Observer. ‘They are being analyzed at the moment, but the links are already so clear that they could end up having profound policy implications for the relationship between us and Ankara.'”

Turkey’s plan to invade its neighboring country of Syria was uncovered last year when a secret recording leaked of the highest officials discussing a plan to launch a military aggression on Syria by using the armed terrorist group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). The launched invasion resulted on aggression against the Armenian city of Kessab in which 80 Armenians were massacred as a result.
The recording shows that Erdogan’s government was orchestrating an unprecedented military aggression against Syria since last Saturday when Turkish tanks and artillery shelled the Syrian lands to provide a cover for armed terrorist groups to enter Syria from Turkey which the recordings prove beyond doubt.

Turkey is not really fighting ISIS, regardless of anyone says. ISIS is the face of terrorism, and Turkey is the one pulling the strings, only acting as though they are fighting terrorism. 






Few of us understand patient gradualism. We live and have our being within a few years and mostly in an unconscious automated state of mind.
But people in power are long-term planners. They absolutely understand human nature and how to channel it to the evolution and refinement of the authoritarian state.
Authoritarianism is based on long-term planning. Authoritarianism is a philosophy of collectivism. Some call it democracy. Some call it communism. Some call it fascism. Some call it National Socialism. But whatever you call it, it is all collectivism or authoritarianism; and in its ultimate form it is globalism.
The goal is perfect docility and perfect harmony with authoritarianism (economic, social and spiritual). Until the people accept collectivism under some pretext, they are not docile and completely subdued. Once they do, rebellion and confrontation are impossible. This is the ultimate goal of the globalists, and the American system is nearing this state.

As I told you last week in “Why is the war on the Confederacy still going on today?,” the dismantling of the middle class has become the appointed, full-time task of the largest government alphabet soup agencies and Wall Street on behalf of globalism. The purpose behind this is that if those big middle-class producers and consumers can be decimated once and for all, then they can join the ranks of low-wage workers and more readily accept government largess and, thereby, become “hooked” on collectivism.

Collectivism is a certain means of social, economic and religious control. Politicians regularly espouse individualism, human liberty and democracy at the same time. Impossible! Individualism and human liberty are opposite to democracy and any other form of collectivism. The collectivist mentality or the mass collective mind is the spirit of the New World Order.
But something is standing in the way. Despite the years of indoctrination through the public (non)education system and mass programming by the national propaganda media and public (i.e., government) policy, rural Middle and Southern middle-class Americans — the “Red States” of “flyover country” — continue to resist the globalists’ dreams of a socialist/Marxist “utopia” and egalitarianism. That’s because they are, by and large, more independent and more self-reliant and also demand equitable reward for their labor and product, placing them in competition for resources and goods with the global elite.

Efforts to remove this obstacle are behind the current war on the middle class and individual liberty and the spirit of individualism through the attempts to whitewash Southern culture from existence and distort the true nature of the Confederate cause by casting it and Confederate symbols as racist and treasonous. The bigoted elites in the District of Criminals and pointy-headed “thinkers” in the prestigious institutes of learning continually promulgate the meme that whites — rural whites in particular and Southern whites specifically — are backward, racist buffoons riding in trucks looking for blacks to lynch while ridiculously clinging to their guns and religion.

The purpose is to stir up racial animosity and manipulate the people against one another. Manipulating minorities who are naturally drawn to socialism is basic political strategy to cover government crime and justify government politics and plunder.
The principle of government is that political power is maximized by forcibly leveling every individual to the same status of conformity, collectivism, egalitarianism and serfdom.
Last summer, there was an invasion of illegals from Central and South America stemming from the immigration policies and statements of President Barack Obama. Over the ensuing months, the Obama regime shipped those illegals into communities and cities across the country and immediately began efforts to grant them some sort of legal status in order to ultimately provide them with voting rights in a back-door effort to change the local demographics and, therefore, the voting outcomes in these communities from a conservative bent to one more socialistic.
Third World immigrants are attracted to cradle-to-grave nanny state socialism because it is what they know and all they have known. They are also more accepting of gun control and the police state. They have no understanding of or experience with individual liberty or the concept of natural rights.

Gaining voting “rights” for non-citizens is the main driver of the federal opposition to voter ID laws.

The Obama regime attempted but failed with a mass social re-engineering scheme in 2010. That effort, fueled by corruptocrat Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), sought to fulfill the United Nation’s Agenda 21 plan, adopted at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and signed onto by “New World Order” President George H.W. Bush.

Now comes Obama’s speciously titled Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing edicts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This extra-constitutional rule change has been in the works for more than two years, but has been largely glossed over by the MSM. It seeks to do the reverse of the Dodd bill. That is, rather than drive the suburbanites into the cities, it seeks to move inner-city minorities into the suburbs.

The AFFH will have the federal government imposing preferred racial and ethnic composition on neighborhoods in exchange for federal funds provided or denied. It will change zoning laws, require a certain amount of government-subsidized housing in rural areas in order to achieve “racial balance,” control transportation and business development and remove the authority of state and local governments in the areas of zoning, transportation and education.

To accomplish its goals, HUD will dig into the racial balance ZIP code by ZIP code looking for areas of segregation, with the segregation threshold being nonwhite populations of 50 percent or more.Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites, according to the New York Post.

To employ this policy, the federal government has undertaken a massive Orwellian-style data collection initiative, prying into the medical records, credit card purchases, mortgage business records, IRS filings, employment records, educational records and local government policy initiatives searching for racial “inequalities” for the Justice Department to prosecute.

The only way to resist this tyranny is for local governments to eschew all federal monies including Community Development Block Grants going forward. Of course, local residents always pressure their community leaders to accept government monies under the auspices that they have paid their “taxes” and want a return on their “investment.” But once the Feds get their hooks into the local community through the distribution of money from the federal treasury, they can exert total control over local government’s functions regarding housing, zoning and regulations far more than they do already.
The globalist agenda is the most comprehensive program for world fascism and world collectivism ever conceived. Its basis is esoteric deception, as carried out pragmatically by mass politics, international mass banking and the mass media. It operates as a whole — as an organism. Today’s democratic globalists make the communists and the Nazis look like amateur totalitarians.




The United Nations Wants its member states, mostly dictatorships and repressive regimes to clamp down
hard on educational freedom under the guise of "human rights." Concerned that students in private schools 
around the world are not receiving sufficient doses of globalist indoctrination prescribed by various global
agreements, the dictator-dominated UN "Human Rights Council" passed a resolution this month calling
on governments worldwide to "monitor" and "regulate" non-governmental education. Governments and
dictators should also impose "standards" on private schools, the UN bureaucrats and government 
representatives said in the deeply controversial document. 


Incredibly, the resolution even speaks of “protecting education from commercialization.” 
What it really means, of course, is protecting government-run monopoly “education” from competition by superior providers. 
After all, why would parents spend money on a private school if the tax-funded “education” provided by government was
 just as good or better? Obviously they would not. So what the UN pseudo-human rights bureaucracy is really saying is 
governments must prevent parents from choosing better alternatives. Of course, following the prescriptions outlined by
 Karl Marx, some members of the UN body actually ban any forms of non-government-run education already.

mischaracterized as “human rights.” Continuing with its long tradition, the body urged governments to “fulfil the right to education” 
by, among other schemes, “putting in place a regulatory framework guided by international human rights obligations for 
education providers that establishes, inter alia,  minimum norms and standards for the creation and operation of 
educational institutions.”
It was not immediately clear what sort of “standards” and “norms” the UN outfit had in mind — 
Nor was it clear how usurping control over private and alternative schools to conform with purported 
“international human rights obligations” would contribute to a better education. In fact, proper education does 
not seem to be the goal at  all, as made clear by a growing deluge of UN documents, resolutions, and other 
schemes demanding that schools worldwide indoctrinate children into new “values,” “attitudes,” “beliefs,” “sustainability,” 
and “global citizenship.”  
The latest UN resolution on education, approved in Geneva on July 1, also calls for governments and dictators to 
start “monitoring private education providers” and “holding accountable those whose practices have a negative
 impact on the enjoyment of the right to education.” Setting aside the fact that education is a service and a privilege, 
not a right — real rights, by definition, mean freedom from coercion, not compulsory “services” from government — 
the resolution did not make clear what sorts of “practices” the UN and its members believe have a “negative impact” on “the  enjoyment  of  the  right  to  education.”
Also in the resolution was a call for governments to use tax funds to support “research” (read: biased “studies” 
touting government education) and “awareness-raising activities” (read: propaganda touting government education) 
on the issue. Supposedly, the “research” and “awareness” should help “better understand the wide-ranging impact of the commercialization of education on the enjoyment of the right to education.” Of course, a mountain of research on the
 topic is already available, and it shows that government-run schools exist to serve government — and that private schools, homeschooling, and other alternatives are drastically superior to “public” education, generally at a fraction of the cost.  
The UN also “calls upon all relevant stakeholders [governments, the UN, government-funded ‘civil society’ groups, 
regional outfits such as the European Union, etc] to ensure that the post-2015 development agenda fosters the
 universal realization of the right to education, including by establishing education targets that are specific, 
measurable, realistic and relevant,” the resolution said. The document did not specify what sort of “education targets”
 it had in mind. But based on previous UN education schemes, indoctrination targets would have been a better term to 
describe the agenda.    
Indeed, in the same resolution, the UN “Human Rights” Council applauded another UN organ, the UN Educational, 
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which has been at the forefront of pushing the extreme ideologies of 
globalism and statism through schools worldwide. “The UNESCO-led UN Decade of Education for Sustainable 
Development, which began in 2005, was explicitly intended to instill in every human being ‘the knowledge, skills, 
attitudes, and values necessary to shape a sustainable future,’” UNESCO chief Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian communist, 
boasted in a recent column. Read that again.
“What is needed now is a global movement, with every student in every country learning about sustainable development 
from well-trained teachers, equipped with the appropriate curricula and resources,” Bokova continued, with
 “sustainable development” meaning a radical redesign of human society toward collectivism, central planning, 
humanism, population control, and global governance. In the same piece, Bokova bragged that her agency, 
which she regularly boasts promotes global humanism, was also “promoting climate-change education in schools.”   
As long as there are private schools outside the control of UN member governments and dictators, there will always 
be children whose “attitudes and values” are not shaped by the accelerating indoctrination efforts. Hence, under the
 guise of “human rights,” many of the UN’s most totalitarian and brutal member regimes demanded in the resolution 
that private schools be brought under government control. If private education negatively affects the “human right to 
education,” though, do privately owned grocery stores negatively affect the “human right to food”? Murderous
 communist dictator Raul Castro, whose regime sits on the UN “Human Rights” Council behind the resolution, 
may think so. But for anyone who appreciates liberty and prosperity, the answer is obvious.  
If the collection of mass-murderers and tyrants on the UN council was not itself enough evidence of the UN’s warped 
view of “human rights,” a brief examination of its scheming provides plenty more. Indeed, the UN’s “human rights” are
notions of human rights. Under the UN’s version of human rights, “rights” come not from God, but from governments, 
treaties, and international organizations. They can also be restricted or abolished by government at will under virtually 
any pretext, as the UN’s own “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” openly admits. And in no case may those alleged
 “rights” be used contrary to the “purposes and principles” of the UN, according to Article 29. In other words, 
you have no rights under UN “human rights.”

Ironically, though, the UN resolution demanding government control over all forms of education would appear to 
violate the UN’s own “Universal Declaration of [pseudo-] Human Rights.” For example, that document clearly 
states in Article 26 that “Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.” 
If parents have the right to choose what kind of education their children will receive, how can the UN “human rights” 
apparatus demand that governments decide what kind of education private schools of parents’ choosing will provide to 
children? The same article in the UN declaration also states that education “shall further the activities of the United Nations.”    
While the UN resolution passed almost entirely unnoticed in the world press, it did have some supporters other than the 
mostly autocratic regimes on the UN “Human Rights” Council. A massive coalition of Astroturf “education” groups — 
some of which openly say they want government school to be made compulsory for all — celebrated the measure, too.
 “The rapid, unregulated growth of private providers of education is already creating — and enabling — violations of the 
right to education, threatening to erase the last 50 years of progress in access to education,” argued Camilla Croso
 with the Global Campaign for Education in a statement. “This resolution shows that States have realized that they 
must act now to regulate such providers — before it is too late.”
In the real world, however, the expansion of educational liberty and the diminishing role of government schools in 
some areas of the world ought to be celebrated. The UN and its member governments around the world have
It is time for the U.S. to withdraw from the UN dictators club, defund it, and get the federal government out of alll 
education once and for all.






A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers. The group is the same one that previously released three covertly shot videos of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research.
The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization.





The group behind the release of recent undercover videos which purport to show Planned Parenthood employees discussing the sale of aborted fetus parts issued a statement Wednesday after a court barred the release of some new footage.
The Los Angeles Superior Court ruled Tuesday that the Center for Medical Progress is prohibited from releasing footage taken at a restaurant in May of high-ranking officials from StemExpress.
StemExpress is a group that provides human tissue to researchers and has a history of working with Planned Parenthood.


In a statement, the Center for Medical Progress blasted StemExpress and accused them of attempting to “suppress free speech.”
Here’s the full statement:
StemExpress, a for-profit company partnered with over 30 abortion clinics, including Planned Parenthood, to harvest and sell aborted baby parts and provide a “financial benefit” to Planned Parenthood clinics, is attempting to use meritless litigation to cover-up this illegal baby parts trade, suppress free speech, and silence the citizen press reporting on issues of burning concern to the American public. They are not succeeding—their initial petition was rejected by the court, and their second petition was eviscerated to a narrow and contingent order about an alleged recording pending CMP’s opportunity to respond. The Center for Medical Progress follows all applicable laws in the course of our investigative journalism work and will contest all attempts from Planned Parenthood and their allies to silence our First Amendment rights and suppress investigative journalism.

On Wednesday, David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress appeared on TheBlaze TV’s “Dana” and called for Planned Parenthood to disclose how much it has profited from its practice.

“We don’t have a good way of knowing because Planned Parenthood’s baby part sales are buried so deep down within their organization that some of the national leadership of Planned Parenthood doesn’t even fully know the scope of it,” he said. “The national office has for many years now chosen to have a ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ policy about the fetal tissue sales of the affiliates in order to … keep themselves insulated it from it legally, even though they’re still aware of it.”













Also see:


































Posted by at 6 comments:

Wednesday, July 29, 2015

China's Crusade To Remove Crosses From Churches, Dramatic Rise In Anti-Semitic Incidents In UK




China's crusade to remove crosses from churches 'is for safety concerns' | World news | The Guardian



A Communist party campaign during which crosses have been stripped from the roofs of more than 1,200 Chinese churches is being conducted “for the sake of safety and beauty”, a government official has claimed.
Human rights activists accuse authorities in Zhejiang province in eastern China of using the protracted campaign to slow Christianity’s growth in what is one of the country’s most churchgoing regions.
By some estimates, China is nowhome to 100 million Christians, compared with the Communist party’s 88 million members.
Since the government campaign began in late 2013, hundreds of places of worship have had bright red crosses removed. Some churches have been completely demolished, while civil servants have been banned from practising religion. Some observers suspect the campaign has the backing of the Chinese president, Xi Jinping, and could be a “pilot project” before a nationwide crackdown
In fact, there is growing anger among China’s rapidly growing Christian community over the campaign, which has affected both Catholic and Protestant congregations. Last Friday, a group of Catholic clergy – including an 89-year-old bishop – took to the streets to protest. “What they are doing feels like something from the Cultural Revolution era,” complained one religious leader from Zhejiang.

This week, Catholic leaders in Wenzhou, a city known as China’s Jerusalem because of its large Christian population, circulated an open letter claiming the removals had got “completely out of control”.
“Our diocese has been patient and reasonable – again and again we have shown tolerance, prayed, communicated and observed, hoping that the haze would clear,” it said. “But they have not stopped. Rather, they have escalated the campaign and have rushed to attack the cross, the symbol of peace and love.”

Addressing China’s Christian population, the letter concluded: “Let us speak out.”

Removals and demolitions have gathered pace in recent weeks despite such protests. A five-storey church in the city of Wenling was demolished “voluntarily”, the government-controlled Zhejiang Daily newspaper announced on Sunday. The newspaper claimed the church had expanded without going through the proper approval process. “It not only affected city planning but also posed a severe threat to road safety,” the report said.

The “anti-church” campaign took an unusual turn this week after claims that officials had deployed groups of incense-burning Buddhist monks to “provoke” Christians who were trying to defend their cross. 

“We are Protestant Christians, so by sending monks to chant sutras they were trying to get us riled up,” a member of one Zhejiang church told Radio Free Asia, a US-funded news website.


The Christian added: “They were trying to make us angry so that we would retaliate against them. They think that anyone who opposes the government is a traitor, or someone trying to overturn the Communist party.”








Is it safe to walk the streets of London in 2015 as an easily identifiable Jew? New data released Thursday would indicate that some British Jews may begin mulling whether they should remove their skull caps or chai pendants before leaving the house.

Britain’s anti-Semitism figures are up by a staggering 53 percent for the first six months of 2015. But the Community Security Trust (CST), which has collated the statistics, says the rise is due to an increase in reporting of incidents, rather than an increase in anti-Semitism in the United Kingdom.

Between January and June 2015, CST recorded 473 anti-Semitic incidents across the UK — up 53% from the same period in 2014. In the full calendar year of 2014, which included wide-spread blowback from Israel’s Gaza War, CST recorded 1,174 anti-Semitic incidents, and was the highest annual total the organization has ever recorded.
However, in addition to the 473 incidents for the first half of 2015, a further 333 potential incidents were reported to CST which, after investigation, were believed not to be anti-Semitic. The rejected incidents included possible hostile reconnaissance or suspicious behaviour near Jewish locations; non-anti-Semitic crime affecting Jewish property or people; or anti-Israel activity that did not involve anti-Semitic language, imagery or targeting.
CST says that the increase in anti-Semitic incidents was most pronounced during the first three months of the year, in the wake of the attacks in Paris and Copenhagen.

“When there is a trigger event, the increase in anti-Semitic incidents usually occurs that day, and the following two days, and then tails off. That didn’t happen with Paris and Copenhagen, in fact we saw an increase about a week and half after those events. And normally, when there is a trigger event — such as Gaza, for example — the anti-Semitic incident, whether it is physical, verbal, or daubing — will contain a reference to it. Again, the incidents in January and February did not refer to what happened in Paris and Copenhagen,” CST deputy director Mark Gardner told The Times of Israel.
CST classifies anti-Semitic incidents according to six categories: extreme violence; assault; damage and desecration to Jewish property; threats; abusive behavior; and anti-Semitic literature.

There were 178 anti-Semitic incidents reported to CST in the first six months of 2015 in which the victims were random Jewish individuals in public. In at least 66 of these incidents the victims were visibly Jewish, due to religious or traditional clothing, Jewish school uniforms, or jewellery bearing religious symbols.

Threats and abusive behavior accounted for 389 separate incidents between January and June 2015, including direct, face-to-face verbal abuse, anti-Semitic graffiti, social media threats and one-off hate mail. Five more incidents related to mass produced or mass-emailed anti-Semitic literature.





Also see:














Posted by at 1 comment:

U.S. State Dept. Bars Christians From Testifying About Persecution, Planned Parenthood Hires Crisis Management Firm As Third Video Is Released




Raymond Ibrahim: U.S. State Dept. Bars Christians from Testifying about Persecution


During the height of one of the most brutal months of Muslim persecution of Christians, the U.S. State Department exposed its double standards against persecuted Christian minorities.
Sister Diana, an influential Iraqi Christian leader, who was scheduled to visit the U.S. to advocate for persecuted Christians in the Mideast, was denied a visa by the U.S. State Department even though she had visited the U.S. before, most recently in 2012.


She was to be one of a delegation of religious leaders from Iraq — including Sunni, Shia and Yazidi, among others — to visit Washington, D.C., to describe the situation of their people. Every religious leader from this delegation to Washington D.C. was granted a visa — except for the only Christian representative, Sister Diana.

After this refusal became public, many Americans protested, some writing to their congressmen. Discussing the nun’s visa denial, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said:
This is an administration which never seems to find a good enough excuse to help Christians, but always finds an excuse to apologize for terrorists … I hope that as it gets attention that Secretary Kerry will reverse it. If he doesn’t, Congress has to investigate, and the person who made this decision ought to be fired.



This is not the first time the U.S. State Department has not granted a visa to a Christian leader coming from a Muslim region. Last year, after the United States Institute for Peace brought together the governors of Nigeria’s mostly Muslim northern states for a conference in the U.S., the State Department blocked the visa of the region’s only Christian governor, Jonah David Jang.
According to a Nigerian human rights lawyer based in Washington D.C., Emmanuel Ogebe, the Christian governor’s “visa problems” were due to anti-Christian bias in the U.S. government:
The U.S. insists that Muslims are the primary victims of Boko Haram. It also claims that Christians discriminate against Muslims in Plateau, which is one of the few Christian majority states in the north. After the [Christian governor] told them [U.S. authorities] that they were ignoring the 12 Shariah states who institutionalized persecution … he suddenly developed visa problems…. The question remains — why is the U.S. downplaying or denying the attacks against Christians?

The testimony of another nun, Sister Hatune Dogan, also made in May, indicates why the State Department may not want to hear such testimonials: they go against the paradigm that “Islam is peace.” According to Sister Hatune:



What is going on there [Islamic State territories], what I was hearing, is the highest barbarism on earth in the history until today… The mission of Baghdadi, of ISIS, is to convert the world completely to the Islamic religion and bring them to Dar Al Salaam, as they call it. And Islam is not peace, please. Whoever says ISIS has no connection to Islam or something like this is, he’s a liar. ISIS is Islam; Islam is ISIS… We know that in Islam, there is no democracy. Islam and democracy are opposite, like black and white. And I hope America will understand. America today has the power that they can stop this disaster on the earth, with other Western countries.


The rest of May’s roundup of Muslim persecution of Christians around the world includes, but is not limited to, the following accounts, listed by theme.










The Center for Medical Progressreleased their third undercover videoof Planned Parenthood’s involvement with the sale of fetal tissue for research. The video features an interview with Holly O’Donnell, a phlebotomist who used to work for Stem Express as a procurement technician.


Viewers should be aware there are parts of the video that are extremely graphic.


O’Donnell provided detailed testimony, stating that Stem Express wanted her to collect as many samples as possible in order to make as much money as possible.
The harder and the more valuable the tissue, the more money you get. So if you can somehow procure a brain or a heart, you can get more money than just like chorionic villi or umbilical cord…I guess that’s an “incentive” to try and get the hard stuff because you get more money.


In a powerful segment of the video, O’Donnell recounted her first day on the job when she was brought to a Planned Parenthood clinic as part of her training. As they entered one of the rooms, she noticed a light tray with pie dishes on it.
She had no idea what was going on.
Then someone came in with a bottle that appeared to be filled with blood, went over to the sink, emptied the contents into a strainer, put it on one of the pie dishes, and lit it up from below. O’Donnell watched in confusion.

And my trainer comes over and she puts on gloves and she grabs some tweezers and she’s picking the parts away from the vaginal tissue. And I’m, I’ve never had anxiety before this at all. So I’m looking and I don’t know what’s going on. I had no idea this was what was going to be happening, especially my first day. And, uh, she’s literally she has tweezers and she’s like, “OK. Well, this is a head. This is the arm. This is a leg.” And then she hands them over to me, “Oh, here you go. Can you show me some of the parts I just showed you?” And I grabbed the tweezers because I didn’t want to lose this job. I didn’t know…
the moment I took the tweezers, I put them in the dish, and I remember grabbing a leg and I said, “This is a leg.” And the moment I picked it up I could just feel, like, death and pain. Like, never felt that before. Like shoot up through my body…. I remember leaving that day, like, “What have I gotten myself into?”
The video then cuts to one of the “buyers” talking with two people in the lab area about the viability of the tissue they are picking through, including a physician by the name of Dr. Grinde. After the “buyer” expresses enthusiasm about how many samples an “11-6” (referring to the age of the fetus) would have provided, Grinde exclaims, “Excellent!” The conversation then turns to matters of money as Grinde says: “…I think a per-item thing works a little better, just because we can see how much we can get out of it.”



No commentary is needed. Anyone who has an ounce of humanity knows this is depraved.


Planned Parenthood has continued to dig in, standing behind their practices. Having been exposed (with many more videos to come) they are now in full panic mode and have hired SKDKnickerbocker, a crisis communications firm. Anita Dunn, the former White House Communications Director who listed Mao ZeDong as one of her favorite philosophers, is their managing director. (‘Nuff said.) Apparently the firm has jumped into action as Planned Parenthood sent letters to some media outlets instructing them not to air the videos. 

Planned Parenthood, the left, and now SKDKnickerbocker will continue to use whateer means necessary to silence the truth and spin this until Planned Parenthood is perceived as the righteous victim. In the Age of Obama it’s anyone’s guess how this will all turn out.


God bless the brave souls at the Center for Medical Progress and Holly O’Donnell for her wisdom, integrity, and willingness to speak out.


















In a radical attack on the due-process rights of Americans that received virtually no media attention, the Republican-controlled House of Representatives voted to give the Obama administration the unilateral power to strip you of your passport and right to travel without a trial or even criminal charges. The scheme does not even include a way to challenge your status as a non-person involuntarily trapped inside U.S. borders on orders from the secretary of state. Lawmakers, some of whom could themselves be caught in the dragnet along with myriad administration officials, praised the effort as a way to stop alleged terrorists from travelling. But critics said it was yet another attack on the fundamental rights of Americans, such as due-process protections, and that it must be resisted.



Under the bill, “the Secretary of State may refuse to issue a passport to any individual whom the Secretary has determined has aided, assisted, abetted, or otherwise helped an organization the Secretary has designated as a foreign terrorist organization,” the text states. “The Secretary of State may revoke a passport previously issued to any individual” whom Secretary of State John Kerry, or future administrations that could be even more radical, unilaterally decides may have done any of those things. The terms are left undefined, opening up widespread potential for abuse, and there is no appeals process outlined in the legislation.

In essence, if approved by the Senate and signed into law by Obama, one man — far-left radical Kerry, for now — would have the power to strip you of your unalienable, God-given rights enshrined in the U.S. Constitution. Under the measure, individuals targeted by Kerry or his successors would have no right to due-process of law — no trial by jury, no chance to contest the findings in open court (or anywhere else), no right to be presumed innocent before proven guilty, not even a right to see the accusations. Indeed, even actual criminal charges are unnecessary under the scheme for somebody to be permanently trapped in or out of the United States based on secret evidence, with no mechanism to appeal.







[This article deals more with the current situation between the U.S. and Russia]


Washington hawks want regime change in Russia, no more and no less. Their hatred of Putin, who has the guts to have his own opinion of world affairs, and who stands firm for his country’s right to look after its security interests, makes him the ultimate evil.


For the past few weeks we have heard plenty of statements from Washington about the huge threat to U.S. National Security coming from Russia. Secretary of Defense Ashton Carter and top Pentagon brass are convinced — or say they are — that the Russian threat is an absolute reality. The latest in this row is the statement by the Head of the US Special Operations Command General Joseph Votel, who also views Russia as an "existential threat" to the United States, repeating accusations against Moscow over the Ukrainian crisis.

In Congress, the party of war keeps pushing the same line but If this were only related to the upcoming budget sequestration discussion — which, among other things, can affect the Pentagon — one could dismiss this incessant talk of an imminent Russian threat as a simple money extortion exercise. However, I am afraid it is not just about money.

Washington hawks want regime change in Russia, no more and no less. Their hatred of Putin, who has the guts to have his own opinion of world affairs, and who stands firm for his country's right to look after its security interests, makes him the ultimate evil — someone who has to go and be replaced by a more malleable character. A person like Boris Yeltsin, who knew who is running the show on the world stage and humbly accepted this sober fact.

It's a different question how to achieve Putin's overthrow without a major military confrontation with Russia, a conflict that can well end in a conflagration engulfing the whole planet. It is one thing to perform regime change in Iraq, Libya or Ukraine but dealing with nuclear-armed Russia is quite a different matter.


Presently the hawks' thinking is still at the stage where they believe they can get rid of Putin through economic sanctions and by using the conflict in Ukraine to exhaust Russia's strength, ruin its economy and undermine its stability. There is no question that substantial damage to Russian economy has been done. It is not "in tatters," as Mr. Obama recently gloated, but is definitely shrinking and the number of people living below the poverty line has indeed increased. However, Putin's popularity is not heading south; on the contrary, his ratings jump a point or two every time another angry anti-Putin rebuke from Washington hits the airwaves.


Instead of accepting the failure of the current policy of sanctions and start searching for some kind of reasonable compromise, the party of war is pushing for escalation in tensions which can end up really badly for everyone. Any incident, however unintentional and insignificant in itself, can grow into something that we all — or rather those who will have survived — will remember with a sense of everlasting wonder at human stupidity.

What we see now resembles the hysteria in 2003 prior to and during the Iraq invasion. The party of war is so hell-bent on its perilous course that it can hardly be swayed by any reasonable arguments of those against warmongering. Nowadays even the most ardent supporters of the Iraq and Libya wars admit that they were huge mistakes which resulted in hundreds of thousands dead and wounded, millions of refugees, trillions of dollars wasted and the rise of ISIS on top of that.

Besides, there is another question that needs to be considered coolly and factually. Does Russia really represent the great or even greatest threat to America or for that matter to any NATO country?

Many Russians believe that actually it is America that represents the greatest threat to their country. Was it Russia that instigated a military coup in Mexico and installed an anti-American corrupted oligarch as its president? Was it Russia that imposed devastating economic sanctions on America — or is it the other way round? Is it Russia that supplies weapons and trains Mexican nationalists who are thinking of getting back territories lost during an armed conflict between the United States and the Centralist Republic of Mexico in the wake of the 1845 US annexation of Texas, which Mexico regarded as its inalienable part. Is it Russia that funds and supports American protest groups, something that we do around the world through the democracy promotion crusade?

As for the huge crowd of presidential candidates, it looks like so far the only one who promises to fix the U.S. — Russia relations thus avoiding a looming disaster is Donald Trump. In his recent interview on CNN he said that he would be able to work well with the Russian president.
No matter how the media and Republican Party establishment are trying to humiliate Trump, I for one would give him a chance.



To many voters, rightly or wrongly, Trump is the antidote to years of Washington’s cynical, manufactured outrages, the petty punishments of those who deviated from the party line, its broken promises, meaningless “show votes,” careful, poll-tested politician speak and a multitude of backroom deals that have solved exactly zero of our nation’s problems. How deliciously humiliating it must be for the political pros of DC. The guy who somberly handed out goofy busywork assignments to people like Stephen Baldwin and the star of Sharknado on “Celebrity Apprentice” has just wandered in, delivered a few speeches off the top of his head and totally taken over the presidential race without breaking a sweat.   
Unlike the DC crowd, Trump knows something about building “brands”—and for now at least he has one that sells. The business guy who can’t be bought. The iconoclast who won’t be controlled. The unrepentant loudmouth who will tell the Boehners and Pelosis and Putins and Kim Jong Uns of the world to stuff it. The quip machine—or insult generator if you prefer—who stands in sharp contrast to the dry, safe, meaningless drivel that passes for most political discourse today.
Intentionally or not, Trump also lets people in on the little DC secrets that those inside the Beltway wouldn’t dare share with regular America. He’s exposed, for example, the fact that office seekers like Rick Perry sucked up to him for millions before he started attacking him. Or that politicians like Lindsey Graham have turned to him for help to get on various TV programs. Or pointing out that the wife of a well-respected political pundit on Fox News works for rival Scott Walker.
Because he is defiantly not a part of the political class, he is impervious to conventional political weaponry. In fact, the attitude of the DC class toward his candidacy—temper tantrums and bouts of monumental arrogance—is only making him stronger.
The fault for the Trump phenomenon lies not only with the GOP, however. In a first for a news organization, the Huffington Post announced that it was unilaterally relegating a legitimate frontrunner for a major political party’s nomination to the entertainment pages. This was the perfect manifestation of the arrogance and elitism Americans despise. The Huffington Post did not perform this “public service” with other presidential candidates whose chances were even more farcical than Trump’s, like Al Sharpton, the professional attention hog. Nor did they exile to their funny pages former Senator Mike Gravel—whose campaign seemed to exist only to publicize its weird “performance art” campaign ads.
Similarly, the Des Moines Register recently demanded that Trump exit the race, even as he scored at or near the top of opinion polls in Iowa, and long before the voters had any say in the matter. Trump replied in a pointed manner that few politicians could muster: “The Des Moines Register has lost much circulation, advertising and power over the last number of years. They will do anything for a headline, and this poorly written ‘non-endorsement’ got them some desperately needed ink.” He made the Register’s action look pompous and silly.
The Daily Beast's effort this week to use Trump's ex-wife, Ivana, against him—a la Marianne Gingrich in 2012—also backfired spectacularly. Rather than labeling her former husband a "rapist," the first Mrs. Trump warmly endorsed him for the White House. 
Thanks to this sort of clumsy incompetence, Trump has been handed every Republican candidate’s dream: the chance to run against both the GOP leadership and the mainstream media.  



Also see:







Posted by at 20 comments:
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)