Adopting the “One Health” approach will affect multiple aspects of everyday life, from agriculture and farming to livestock and food production to environmental issues. The “One Health” agenda is designed to globally declare possible pandemic-type risks, which will naturally lead to forced lockdowns and restrictions placed upon the private sector. The solution will be more mass vaccinations and, for the safety of the general public, more types of surveillance on private citizens.
In 2018, the National One Health Steering Committee (NOHSC) and Technical Working Groups (TWG) agreed to a five-year strategic plan. Part of that strategic plan is the Global Health Security Agenda. What is that? The Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA) is a global effort to strengthen the world’s ability to prevent, detect, and respond to infectious disease threats. More than 70 countries, including the United States, have signed onto the GHSA framework.
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), which works directly with other governments, plays a leading role in supporting progress towards the GHSA’s targeted goals for 2024.
WHO Pandemic Agreement
The most recently updated version of the WHO Pandemic Agreement, last amended on April 22, is designed to redistribute wealth and protective equipment away from the U.S. and establish a global governing board with little accountability to U.S. citizens.
WHO has made it clear that it intends to involve itself far beyond the aspects of possible pandemic outbreaks. The latest agreement calls for WHO to be hands-on with such items as climate change, poverty, and hunger.
Some will say this is all about money—pharmacies, hospitals, and those who gain financially. However, according to a Wall Street Journal article from April 2021, forty new billionaires were created, and over 200,000 small businesses were destroyed in the U.S. in 2020 alone. The last pandemic was not about wealth; it was about wealth transfer.
When this pandemic agreement becomes binding, nations will still have the right to adopt laws, but only per the Charter of the United Nations and the WHO constitution. Countries cannot make changes that are incompatible with the WHO Pandemic Agreement.
The WHO Pandemic Agreement, as it is written, would authorize funding and support for abortion. The agreement obligates nations during pandemics to ensure the provision of essential healthcare services, which means abortion would be considered an essential service.
Kate Bingham and Tim Hames of the WHO, using fear as a tool, warn in their book, The Long Shot: The Inside Story of the Race to Vaccinate Britain, which was released in March of 2023, paint the picture of a hypothetical disease such as “Disease X” which could become the next pandemic and kill fifty million people worldwide. They open their book by saying this is the work of two authors but one voice. Proposing a pandemic designed to kill fifty million people may be the work of many authors, but the one voice they are listening to is not God. Second Timothy says God did not give us the spirit of fear.
World Health Assembly
What is the timing of all this? The ninth set of meetings to revise and finalize the WHO Pandemic Agreement will take place from April 29 to May 10, 2024. Two weeks later, from May 27 to June 1 in Geneva, Switzerland, the 77th World Health Assembly will meet to finalize these agreements. This will dictate how the United States and the world respond to any future pandemics.
As of now, the WHO pandemic agreement is easy to enter but almost impossible to leave. The language of this agreement is designed so that once a nation signs onto the accord, it “shall not be discharged” from any “obligations which happened while it was a Party to the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” even after it withdraws.
A Treaty, An Agreement, or a Framework?
It is pointed out that the WHO refuses to call this treaty a treaty; they are calling it an agreement or a framework. If it is called a treaty, it would have to be submitted to the treaty process in the United States, which could delay or even derail this agreement.
Congressman Smith says, “This is on a fast track. Much of this has been done without very much scrutiny or insight. However, we do know from the draft of this pandemic treaty that it will be binding. They say it right in the treaty. It will be as if the U.S. Congress and the President signed a law that does all these things.”
The press conference acknowledges this treaty or agreement calls for surveillance and digital I.D.s.
This global effort is part of the United Nations Sustainable Development Program. In fact, the White House issued a fact sheet in February 2022 endorsing the United States’ commitment to the Global Health Security Agenda. You can find this fact sheet on the White House’s website.
No comments:
Post a Comment