The abolition of money, as originally proposed by Karl Marx, would inevitably lead to surveillance because every input and output must be tracked.
Marx’s ideology, when implemented, would result in a system of control and rationing of energy – which is the goal of technocracy.
Marx built the blueprint for surveillance by eliminating money, while Lenin operationalised it, openly demanding accounting and control as the essence of socialism, while simultaneously calling for a vanguard police state to uphold it.
Hah, such liberty and freedom.
It’s even particularly retarded because the elimination of money itself. This essentially leads to a situation where the person cannot possibly be left with a free choice in terms of spending their own money.
If you opt to argue that what the person receives to spend as he sees fit is vouchers in “units of social labour time,” then – congratulations – you’ve arrived back with a currency.
I’m now more convinced than ever that Marx and Engels were frauds.
We can then further add the producer-consumer analysis in ‘Das Kapital’, an early-stage input-output analysis, which fundamentally assumes perfect knowledge – but to have perfect knowledge, we’re back to full-spectrum surveillance.
Incidentally, central banks are the only organisations with the information available to even attempt to implement Marx’s stupid system, as they sit at the apex of information relating to monetary flows.
It’s just another coincidence, I’m sure.
The circular economy thus logically becomes the full information visibility Marx demands, and it’s set in Boulding’s closed system, which means a singular measured organism, which is the basis Marx operated on.
Ooh, I get it … the circular economy itself is pretty sketchy because most non-renewable materials don’t actually disappear. Sure, e.g., metal dug up from the ground changes in form and what it’s integrated in, but only really energy resources change form …. and that then takes us to the central pivot point of technocracy – energy. And the future carbon-backed CBDC is essentially the inverse of the “energy certificate” of Technocracy Inc.
Consequently, from a logical perspective, Marx’s retarded ideology … actually, scratch that … hyper-deceptive ideology logically leads to control and rationing of energy, and to control that, you have to eliminate nuclear energy. Renewables are not really a major issue because they cannot really compete with energy resources such as oil in terms of flexibility and ease of storage.
Consequently, Marx’s religion logically leads to surveillance and rationing of energy – which is what technocracy seeks to implement.
That also explains why the currency must be split up into two – one accumulates interest (not for the proles) and the other has an expiry date, because you cannot allow people to save, as it distorts the claimed perfect informational view.
That also explains why they intend to fuse carbon backing with CBDCs – it’s the theoretical justification for communism realised through its practical implementation – and the circular economy then completes the picture with a full informational view. And an ISO standard is perfect here, because it, as I’ve pointed out [see below], is a key part of the ISO/OECD/IIASA triad of collectivism.
And social credit systems and ESG scoring then become the basis for the reward mechanisms feeding into the currency itself, where “positive” behaviours are rewarded and “negative” are punished. And that, once again, leads to complete surveillance and audited control, much like Lenin called for (and never mind the vanguard police state backing this up with force).
No comments:
Post a Comment