There’s trouble brewing, and the government is masterminding a response using the military.
Just take a look at “Megacities: Urban Future, the Emerging Complexity,” a Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command.
The training video is only five minutes long, but it says a lot about the government’s mindset, the way its views the citizenry, and the so-called “problems” that the government must be prepared to address in the near future through the use of martial law.
Even more troubling, however, is what this military video doesn’t say about the Constitution, about the rights of the citizenry, and about the dangers of locking down the nation and using the military to address political and social problems.The training video anticipates that all hell will break loose by 2030, but the future is here ahead of schedule.
We’re already witnessing a breakdown of society on virtually every front.
By waging endless wars abroad, by bringing the instruments of war home, by transforming police into extensions of the military, by turning a free society into a suspect society, by treating American citizens like enemy combatants, by discouraging and criminalizing a free exchange of ideas, by making violence its calling card through SWAT team raids and militarized police, by fomenting division and strife among the citizenry, by acclimating the citizenry to the sights and sounds of war, and by generally making peaceful revolution all but impossible, the government has engineered an environment in which domestic violence is becoming almost inevitable.
The danger signs are screaming out a message
The government is anticipating trouble (read: civil unrest), which is code for anything that challenges the government’s authority, wealth and power.
According to the Pentagon training video created by the Army for U.S. Special Operations Command, the U.S. government is grooming its armed forces to solve future domestic political and social problems.
What they’re really talking about is martial law, packaged as a well-meaning and overriding concern for the nation’s security.
This is how you prepare a populace to accept a police state willingly, even gratefully.
You don’t scare them by making dramatic changes. Rather, you acclimate them slowly to their prison walls.
Before long, no one will even notice the floundering economy, the blowback arising from military occupations abroad, the police shootings, the nation’s deteriorating infrastructure and all of the other mounting concerns.
It’s happening already.
The irony here the people imposing a police state to combat civil unrest are the same people who launched civil unrest in the 1960's. Example - the advent of the UC Berkeley free speech movement (Fall 1964) in conjunction with the escalation of the Vietnam War. In short order (Spring 1965) anti-war protesters swept the country demanding radical changes in society. Their goals achieved; education decline, family disintegration, established religion mocked and marginialized, sorceries, youth rebellion-disobedience to parents, social justice, massive increase in crime, inflationary and fewer economic opportunities for working and middle class (bourgeoisie - anathema to Marxists), legalized abortion, no fault divorce and the beat goes on, etc.
ReplyDeleteHas Cher booked her flight yet to leave country?
ReplyDelete