Dr. Jill Glasspool Malone: UN’s aim of becoming the One World Government
By globally synchronising the public health response across the United Nations (“UN”) member states, new powers were granted to the UN. These universally applied regulations and multilateral agreements have created a vast interlocking public health network throughout the world which in turn birthed a new, globalised administrative state.
The UN has been quietly gestating and building power for years before the pandemic through agreements such as Agenda 2030 and has now become a sovereign power unto itself. This is the shadow global government that seeks to regulate every dimension of our lives.
Their goal is total world control – with unelected officials at the helm.
By Dr. Jill Glasspool Malone
By globally synchronising the public health response across the United Nations member states, new powers were granted to the UN and its organisations at the cost of national sovereignty. These universally applied regulations and multilateral agreements have given birth to an enlarged, globalised administrative state.
Although this power grab has been percolating for many decades, the COVIDcrisis acted as an accelerant to synergise international agreements that advance the UN as a world government.
The United Nations has morphed into a leviathan. Its various agreements and goals seek to centrally dictate the world’s economy, migration, “reproductive health”, monetary systems, digital IDs, environment, agriculture, wages, climate modifications, one world health, and other related globalist programs.
To be clear, these are the goals of an organisation seeking a globalised command economy, not an organisation focused on world peace, ending wars or human rights!
This UN aims to regulate every dimension of our personal and national lives. It is working to reduce and eliminate national sovereignty across the world, and thereby to decrease our diversity, our traditions, our religions and our national identities.
The UN has partnerships and strategic agreements with member nations, as well as other globalist organisations such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the World Bank, CEPI, GAVI, The World Trade Organisation, The European Union and the World Economic Forum, known as the WEF.
For an example of how the United Nations operates.
The WEF and the UN signed a strategic agreement and partnership in 2019. Remember that the WEF has a commitment to “stakeholder capitalism,” by which private partnerships work to control governments.
The WEF developed a plan in 2020 to use the COVIDcrisis to reorganise global governance around social issues including climate change – this plan was called the Great Reset.
The WEF is a trade organisation representing the world’s largest corporations. It repeatedly exploits disruptive technologies to enhance economic growth opportunities for its corporate members. The WEF is specifically designed to advance the economic power of its global elite members, otherwise known as the “billionaire class.”
As the WEF feeds money into the United Nations through their 2019 strategic agreement, who is managing the conflicts of interest that come with this partnership? Where is the transparency?
The UN has fourteen specialised organisations under its leadership, all involved in global governance, including the World Health Organization or WHO.
None of these organisations have anything to do with the scope of the original UN charter, which was focused on ending wars, promoting world peace and human rights.
The UN has been quietly building power for years prior to the pandemic through various agreements and treaties. For instance, the “2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” is a recent example of such an agreement. Agenda 2030 is a treaty for “transforming our world” and was signed into international law in 2015. This treaty has elevated the United Nations to a position of a self-serving global government bureaucracy.
Agenda 2030 has 17 goals and 169 targets, which vary widely in scope and topic, but almost all of these goals directly affect world governance.
Here are just a few examples from the Agenda 2030 treaty. Is this what the United Nations should be concerned with, or are these issues more properly addressed by the policies of sovereign nations?
Agenda 2030 is essentially a totalitarian socialist manifesto. These and many more forceful statements regarding the reduction of national rights are found in this United Nations Treaty.
The UN has signed strategic agreements with the largest organisations, corporations and world powers to fulfil their utopian vision for the world.
This is a new world order- with unelected officials in control. That means that you and I will be ruled by a non-democratic UN administrative bureaucracy. This is a form of inverse totalitarianism. A world order based on a command economy; one that is at its core both socialist and totalitarian.
Now, these goals and targets may be fine for any single nation to undertake but this is a re-structuring of the United Nations beyond its charter.
Early in the pandemic, the UN – through its surrogate the WHO – declared that a global vaccine passport was needed, and provided extensive guidance to member nations to standardise vaccine passports worldwide.
In response, the leaders of the G20 issued a declaration in 2022 supporting the development of a global standard of vaccination for international travel and the establishment of “global digital health networks” to be built on existing digital covid-19 vaccine passports.
In June 2023, a new initiative between the EU and the WHO for strategic cooperation on global health issues was announced. This agreement seeks to: “Bolster a robust multilateral system with the World Health Organisation at its core, powered by a strong European Union.”
After failing to manage the COVIDcrisis, the WHO now seeks more money and power to control all aspects of our health and lives. They intend to amend the International Health Regulations to govern the “pandemic prevention, preparedness and response” of future outbreaks, which includes public health emergencies of any type. This includes a major role for the WHO in direct governance, as opposed to a guidance-based role.
These changes are predicated on G20 global adoption of “vaccine passports.” These passports will collect and contain private health data and will enable surveillance, tracking and control of individuals and populations worldwide. The passports will include not only covid-19 vaccine data but the status of all vaccinations. It will become a world digitised passport – including personal health information that the United Nations has no right to access.
No comments:
Post a Comment