Jenin must not become Gaza: Rocket launches will force Israel to make a choice

Jenin must not become Gaza: Rocket launches will force Israel to make a choice

Meir Ben Shabbat

The rocket fire from northern Samaria means Israel has reached a decision point. But it must not enter a dangerous adventure without having a clear diplomatic goal that complements the security objectives. The PA's role in the day after is also key.

The rockets fired from the Jenin area toward northern Israel (which failed to reach any meaningful distance) may be what it takes to convince the skeptics that a large operation is needed against terrorists in northern Samaria. Israel cannot allow Judea and Samaria to become another Gaza. 

The key dilemma facing the Israeli leadership is what kind of operation should be launched and how should the PA be treated. Should it be considered part of the problem or as a part of the solution? Or perhaps both, as Israel has unofficially done for quite some time. Making a decision on this matter is crucial if we want to define the mission for such an operation and the scope for the IDF and the Shin Bet security agency. 

As for the security agencies, the main challenge they face is how to implement the so-called Maximum-Minimum policy: inflicting the maximal damage but minimizing the threat to our forces without having to confront other actors and theaters. Apart from arrests, such an operation would also include confiscating arms, destroying explosive labs, and taking out of the various support networks that prop up the terrorists. 

If Israel chooses to launch an operation it would have to take into consideration that it could spill over to another theater. There could also be revenge attacks, and the terrorists in Gaza might choose to enter the fray. Israeli Arabs may also decide to join the fighting. 

Apart from that, we should assume that Israel will have its hands full explaining the operation on the world stage and engage the Arab world, including the Abraham Accords signatories. 

The security apparatuses have had many achievements in the ongoing terrorist wave. But they have yet to create the desired strategic impact: The motivation for attacks has not subsided; the number of the attacks and attempted attacks have not dropped, and neither has their lethality. Against this backdrop, there are those who believe that the surgical approach has become obsolete, and this is all the more evident in the recent rocket attacks from Jenin. 

The rise of the rocket threat in Gaza has been seared into the collective memory of the security establishment and the decision-makers. Initially, the rocket development efforts were mocked at, only to soon become sophisticated to the point that they gave Gazan terrorists the ability to put large swaths of the population under threat. The Palestinian Authority's contribution to this reality, in its inaction and action, is beyond doubt. And we should keep that in mind as we go forward. 

But Israel cannot enter such a dangerous adventure without having a clear diplomatic goal that complements the security objectives.

Israel has to assume that the development of rocket-related know-how in Jenin was partially a result of help from Hamas elements in the Gaza Strip or beyond. The Israeli security establishment must track them down and make sure they are also held accountable. If it turns out that Hamas had used various entry permits to Israel for Palestinian workers to advance this cause, then Israel should end this dangerous practice of allowing entry.