The War Upon Us

The War Upon Us All

Alex Krainer

More than 60 years ago John F. Kennedy issued a warning about the “monolithic and ruthless conspiracy” that was using “covert means for expanding its sphere of influence.” He also warned us about the “very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon” by the perpetrators of this conspiracy to advance their agenda.

In 2020, the Covid 19 pandemic offered the would-be conspirators an ideal opportunity. The worldwide emergency enabled them to launch a decisive gambit to sidestep the legal strictures of democratic rule and attempt to create a global authoritarian police state. The experience was hugely distressing to the people in almost every nation, but it was also very revealing about the nature, methods and the objectives of the conspiracy. While the public response to the pandemic was unscientific and contrary to the established norms of public health policy, it was also nearly identical in most nations, suggesting that the incoherence was not an error, but an integral part of the planned policy response. 

This policy, including the media-driven narrative and the draconian censorship of all dissent was clearly coordinated at a supra-national level. To achieve such policy coordination across the world could not have been achieved without a powerful force of coercion. But what force could explain such uniform compliance with the same destructive policy mistakes by nations large and small, rich and poor, powerful and weak all around the world? Who could force nations of the whole world to obey its dictate, and how?

We had the first glimpse of this force in action in June 2020 when Belarus’ president Aleksandr Lukashenko publicly snubbed a $940 million line of credit from the International Monetary Fund. He rejected it because the IMF conditioned the loan on Belarus imposing a strict Covid 19 lockdown policy and a curfew. Significantly, Lukashenko mentioned on several occasions that the IMF negotiators wanted Belarus to do “like in Italy.” Conditioning loans with terms that would severely impair the borrower’s ability to repay makes no economic sense, so the conditionality clearly had different objectives. Deep in debt and with collapsed tax revenues, most governments around the world needed loans, making them prey to the dictates of money power.

By April 2020, 85 nations have formally requested financial assistance from the IMF. To secure the needed funds they presumably accepted the terms, agreeing to follow the World Health Organization (WHO) dictate. As a result, they extended the lockdowns beyond all reason, destroying countless small and medium-sized businesses, shut down schools, created stasi-like contact-tracing programs, conspired to obscure effective treatments and instituted heavy-handed censorship of public discourse. They also agreed to promote vaccinations as the only way for us to return to normal life and cooperated on instituting Covid passes that would condition their own citizens’ freedom of movement on their compliance – first with the vaccine requirements, but ultimately with any demand that the global authorities might deem conducive to their agenda.

We only learned about IMF’s terms because the president of Belarus disclosed them publicly. Other governments quietly accepted the money and agreed to the terms. But in doing so and complying with the WHO policy dictate, government officials effectively took orders from an external power to the detriment of their own nations, economies, and populations.

More...