[The 'bottom line' to almost everything we see today is described below (particularly the part in red)]
The difference is really quite simple to explain. The right believes people are capable of self governance, are compassionate, and are able to act with goodwill towards their fellow man. We believe in a definite morality that defines good and evil because we believe in God. We believe in personal responsibility and that all life has value, and, in most cases, when left to their own devices, people will do good things.
The left, on the other hand, believes in Darwinian evolution, which says God does not exist and that man is no different than an animal that has to be trained. They believe that man has to be controlled and they do not differentiate between good and evil. To them, there are no good people because we are all subject to our animalistic instincts and that any moment, anyone carrying a gun can turn into a raving lunatic and commit mass murder. They despise Christianity and they hate the idea of an absolute morality that defines good and evil. The left believes in psychology and psychiatry, and that man's entire behavior can be controlled through the stimulus-response mechanism discovered by Ivan Pavlov. Not only do they believe this, they want you to believe it as well.
Our environment is currently being manipulated on many levels to cause the most shock and terror in the consciousness of man in order to optimize human behavior in favor of government objectives.
The economy is deliberately being collapsed, our country is deliberately being flooded with those who do not share our values and, in many cases, who have threatened to carry out the type of attacks we have just witnessed. The media is aiding and abetting by keeping the worst news possible in our faces all day and night in order to affect the way we see our world. Consider what the Manual on Psychopolitics has to say.
What does this mean?
It means constant exposure to every terrorist attack and mass shooting through the television media causes traumatic injury to the human consciousness.
People are living in a state of panic and uncertainty through the stimulus-response mechanism, with the end goal being a voluntary surrender of our liberties - surrendering liberty for security, in other words. The only way to combat this is to first understand that this is, in fact, what is occurring. Secondly, understand that there is an objective and that objective is changing the geo-political make up of the country.
They want you to believe that we cannot be free. They want you to believe that man must be controlled for our own safety. They want you to believe that communism is the solution. You must educate yourself and be ready to defend American principles. Allowing yourself to be silenced because you are unable to articulate what you believe only aides in their efforts. Stand up, America: time is short.
A victim of Sunday’s early morning terror attack at the Pulse nightclub gave a bombshell interview to an ABC reporter after being released from a local hospital.
During the interview the eyewitness, who played dead for several hours during the attack as a strategy to stay alive, said that he had overheard a phone conversation that the shooter was engaged in. The eyewitness said that the shooter made mention that he was the “fourth shooter” and that there were “three others,” “snipers,” along with a ‘female suicide bomber’ that was playing dead.
Additionally the witness said that the terrorist on the phone also mentioned “to stop bombing ISIS.”
This is absolutely bombshell info that is being suppressed by the mainstream press! This information should be the focus on every mainline channel!
On March 16, 2016 WikiLeaks launched a searchable archive for over 30,000 emails and attachments sent to and from Hillary Clinton's private server while Clinton was serving as Secretary of State. According to The Guardian, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange said that the organization plans to publish even more.
During the interview with itv, when asked if Assange had any undisclosed emails, the WikiLeaks founder responded:
"We have upcoming leaks in relation to Hillary Clinton, which is great, WikiLeaks has a very big year ahead. We have emails related to Hillary Clinton which are pending publication, that is correct."
Asked about the FBI investigation itself, and how Assange believed that would end, Assange said that there have been enough emails released that could lead to an indictment.
"Unfortunately I think what's going to happen is that the FBI is going to go 'we have accumulated a lot of material about Hillary Clinton, we could proceed to an indictment'", but Loretta Lynch, head of the DOJ won't end up indicting.
"She's not going to indict Hillary Clinton... It's not possible that could happen, but the FBI could push for concessions from [a] new Clinton government in exchange for its lack of indictment." Assange added.
Although the state Department has been releasing emails (reluctantly), WikiLeaks has taken all of the documents and made it easy for anyone who wishes to search through and read the correspondence to do so all in one place. The release of more emails is just the latest in an attempt to shed some light on Clinton's dealings, and is in line with WikiLeaks search for truth, which Assange believes is that Clinton is a "liberal war hawk", citing emails WikiLeaks had published showing Hillary to be the leading champion of the push to overthrow the Libyan government.
As we reported, Assange has made it clear that Clinton is just in search of endless war: "A vote today for Hillary Clinton is a vote for endless, stupid war", which he then followed by saying "Hillary didn't just vote for Iraq. She made her own Iraq. Libya is Hillary's Iraq and if she becomes president she will make more."
While the new set of emails that WikiLeaks is set to release may provide a temporary speed bump for the Clinton campaign, Assange may be right about his indictment theory. Recall back in April when we wrotethat the FBI may leak details of the investigation if it feels the DOJ is standing in the way - well that started happening just a few days ago, which perhaps means no indictment is coming from the DOJ. What appears all but certain to come however, is more endless war if Clinton is able to defeat Donald Trump in the fall. On the bright side, think of how well global GDP will do if there are more global conflicts... right?
As a reminder, you can access the searchable database here.
Huma Abedin is Vice Chair of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign. But Huma is more, much more than that. She is the person closest to the most powerful woman in American politics and perhaps the next President. Huma has been described variously as Hillary’s “body woman,” a sort of glorified go-to personal maid, gentle confidant, and by others as an Islamic spy. She may be all of these things, because as we shall see, Huma Abedin has an interesting and complex career history.
Two years after Huma was born, the family moved to Jeddah, Saudi Arabia and with the patronage of Abdullah Omar Naseef of the Muslim World League, founded the Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs with offices in Saudi Arabia and London, England. In the 1980’s Syed Abedin was a counselor of the Muslim World League. After his death in 1993, his wife Saleha took over and serves as director of the IMMA (Institute of Muslim Minority Affairs) and as the editor of that organization’s academic magazine, the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs. More recently she still edits the Journal and is also a part of the administration of Dar Al-Hekma Women’s College.
Naseef’s connections to the entire Abedin family are significant — and, for reasons you’ll see in a moment, very troubling. As Vanity Fair wrote, during “his early years as the patron of the Abedins’ journal, Nasseef was the secretary-general of the Muslim World League” and gives more shocking details about the Abedins:
It turns out the Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs is an Abedin family business. Huma was an assistant editor there between 1996 and 2008. Her brother, Hassan, 45, is a book-review editor at the Journal and was a fellow at the Oxford Center for Islamic Studies, where Nasseef is chairman of the board of trustees. Huma’s sister, Heba, 26, is an assistant editor at the Journal.
That’s what all the fuss is about. Since 1962, the Muslim World League has been funded by the Saudi government to the tune of more than $1.3 billion.
No comments:
Post a Comment