A news report from Russia’s Interfax News Service quotes “the press-secretary of the US embassy in Moscow,” whom it identifies as “William Stevens,” as saying that during a meeting U.S. CIA Director William Brennan had in Moscow with “Russia officials” “in early March,” “Director Brennan” chose “to emphasize with Russian officials the importance of Russia and the Assad regime following through on their agreements to implement the cessation of hostilities in Syria” and that, “Director Brennan also reiterated the US government’s consistent support for a genuine political transition in Syria, and the need for Assad’s departure in order to facilitate a transition that reflects the will of the Syrian people.”
If the allegation is true, then the U.S., “in early March,” was demanding “Assad’s departure,” despite there being no participation of the Syrian people in that decision — no new election in Syria, much less Assad’s losing any such election; and, yet, Mr. Brennan was demanding this, “in order to facilitate a transition that reflects the will of the Syrian people,” somehow (despite there being no democratic process whatsoever).
Even Western polling firms have been finding that Assad’s remaining as Syria’s leader is supported by 55% of Syrians, and that the U.S. is blamed by 82% of Syrians as being the source of Syria’s civil war: “82% agree ‘IS [Islamic State] is US and foreign made group’.” In other words: Syrians, the most secular, the most anti-theocratic, people in the entire Middle East, blame people such as John Brennan as the source of their miseries. This same poll found that “79% agree ‘Foreign fighters made war worse’.” It also found: “70% agree ‘Oppose division of country’.”
The Obama Administration favors breaking Syria up into sectarian enclaves: Alawite-Shiite, versus Sunni, versus Druze, versus Kurd. This would be essential in order to permit Saudi Arabia to build an oil pipeline into Europe through the Sunni part of Syria, and Qatar also to build a gas pipeline through the Sunni part of Syria, both in order to get their (U.S.-corporate-backed) oil and gas into Europe, so as to replace Russia’s main market for its oil and gas, which is the EU.
Clearly, American involvement in the political process in Syria is unwelcomed, if not loathed, by the Syrian people. They don’t want the U.S. to continue supporting the jihadists who are destroying their country; and they also don’t want the U.S. dictating that Bashar al-Assad will stop being their leader.
It has been an alliance between the leaderships of U.S., Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE; but, regardless of whether it’s called “the U.S. alliance” or “the Saudi alliance,” or even (possibly) “the Turkish alliance” (and it could be called by any of those three names), it’s the jihadist alliance, and it now seems to be near its final defeat, by, quite clearly, the Russian alliance: Russian air power has enabled the Syrian army (called the SAA or “Syrian Arab Army”) of Bashar al-Assad, plus Lebanon’s Shiite warriors (called “Hezbollah”), plus organization by Iran’s generals, to exterminate thousands of ISIS jihadists. The pro-Syrian alliance, under Russian air-power, are now making final preparations to finish the job, in the Syrian headquarters of ISIS — the city of Raqqa, where ISIS’s “Caliph” is, who could soon be meeting his end.
This major military victory, in Palmyra — the center of the Jihadist-controlled region of Syria (and located south of Raqqa, separated from it only by desert) — was announced on Easter Sunday, 27 March 2016, by the website Syrian Perspective (one of the world’s two great news-sites covering the Syrian war, the other being Al Masdar News), as they headlined, “Palmyra Liberated! General Ayyoob Reviews Troops in Aftermath of Enormous Victory; What’s Next?”
The Syrian and Russian Air Forces have been directed into the air to block any movement of terrorist ISIS rodents to any area considered a stronghold. This means that no deal was ever struck between the army and the murderers inside the city. Instead, what happened was the army was commanded to permit a withdrawal with the understanding that escaped rats would still be targets once the city was liberated. As I write, SAA engineers are everywhere inside the city removing IEDs, booby-traps and mines. It’s a thankless task replete with danger, but, it must be done in order to return the population to a safe city.
A new study shows that knowledge of government surveillance causes people to self-censor their dissenting opinions online. The research offers a sobering look at the oft-touted "democratizing" effect of social media and Internet access that bolsters minority opinion.
The study, published in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, studied the effects of subtle reminders of mass surveillance on its subjects. The majority of participants reacted by suppressing opinions that they perceived to be in the minority. This research illustrates the silencing effect of participants’ dissenting opinions in the wake of widespread knowledge of government surveillance, as revealed by whistleblower Edward Snowden in 2013.
The “spiral of silence” is a well-researched phenomenon in which people suppress unpopular opinions to fit in and avoid social isolation. It has been looked at in the context of social media and the echo-chamber effect, in which we tailor our opinions to fit the online activity of our Facebook and Twitter friends. But this study adds a new layer by explicitly examining how government surveillance affects self-censorship.
The sick jihadis said the attack will come “from where you don't expect” in a sinister propaganda video comes just days after the Brussels terror attacks.
ISIS claimed responsibility for the attacks on the Belgian capital which struck an airport and metro station - leaving 31 dead at 300 injured.
ISIS claimed responsibility for the attacks on the Belgian capital which struck an airport and metro station - leaving 31 dead at 300 injured.
The latest chilling video, narrated in English, claims ISIS are plotting to "invade" the capitals of Europe - including London and Berlin - "like we did in Paris before".
The group also threatens to "rip the crosses" off every Christian church.
The sinister propaganda video concludes by showing the Eiffel Tower exploding and crashing to the ground.
The group also threatens to "rip the crosses" off every Christian church.
The sinister propaganda video concludes by showing the Eiffel Tower exploding and crashing to the ground.
The video begins with a river of blood pooling and dripping off a wooden table filled with stacks of American money, guns, knives and bullets.
But, the clip features the name of video game designer with a US company carved into the wood of the animated table.
The video also includes footage of air strikes on ISIS targets and news reels of attacks they have carried out.
But, the clip features the name of video game designer with a US company carved into the wood of the animated table.
The video also includes footage of air strikes on ISIS targets and news reels of attacks they have carried out.
The narrator warned: "To you western Kafir, you that meant to fight Islam, vengeance is coming against the 'new crusaders'.
"It will be welcomed by Allah's permission."
The video goes on to show ISIS members tearing down church crosses in Christian communities in the Middle East after being taken over by the terror group.
"It will be welcomed by Allah's permission."
The video goes on to show ISIS members tearing down church crosses in Christian communities in the Middle East after being taken over by the terror group.
The narrator adds: "We will come to you and terrify you everywhere.
"We will come after you from where you don't expect and fill your streets with blood."
"We will come after you from where you don't expect and fill your streets with blood."
Also see:
Well, finally after 4+ years and untold numbers of lives, misery and suffering. An official statement as to one of the root causes of this mayhem.....pipeline access. We want ours, they want theirs.
ReplyDeleteAnd at the risk of sounding like a broken record....what conceivable right do we have of demanding a change in leadership of another sovereign country that wants no quarrel with us? Its insane.
Indeed it is and the US has been doing it for decades. Egypt was smart enough to deal with it and so is putin. Libya wasnt as fortunate
ReplyDelete