Saturday, October 24, 2015

Muslim Invasion Of Europe, Things To Come: Behavioral Conditioning, Cashless Society






  • The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. Many migrants have no passport, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.
  • Because Islam is the heart of the culture of people formerly colonized, Europeans rejected criticism of Islam, saying it would blend smoothly into a multicultural Europe. They did not demand the assimilation of the Muslims who came to live in Europe. Much of the time, Muslims are not assimilated -- and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate.
  • Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and "Islamophobia" is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.
  • European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors by technocrats and professional politicians in Brussels or Strasbourg.
  • Europe has renounced force, so to many, it appears weak, vulnerable and easily able to be overpowered.
  • The sudden arrival of hundreds of thousands more Muslims most likely prompts Europeans to think that the nightmare will get worse; they see, powerlessly, that their leaders speak and act as if they have no awareness of what is happening.
  • Central European leaders and people, who have already lived under authoritarian rule, seem to be thinking that entering the European Union was a huge mistake. They came to what was then called the "free world." They do not seem willing to be subjected again to coercive decisions made by outsiders.
  • Illegal Muslim migrants will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states.
  • In all 28 countries of the European Union, birth rates are low and the population is aging. People under thirty account for only 16% of the population, or 80 million people. In the 22 Arab countries, plus Turkey and Iran, people under thirty account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.


Journalists in Western Europe continue to depict them as "refugees" fleeing war in Syria. The description is false. According to statistics released by the European Union, only twenty-five percent of them come from Syria; the true number is probably lower. The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. The vast majority of migrants come from other countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.

Many do not seem to have left in a hurry. Many bring new high-end smartphones and large sums of cash, ten or twenty thousand euros, sometimes more. Many have no passports, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.

Whenever people flee to survive, the men come with whole families: women, children, elders. Here, instead, more than 75% of those who arrive are men under 50; few are women, children or elders.

As Christians are now the main targets of Islamists (the Jews fled or were forced out decades ago), the people escaping the war in Syria should be largely composed of Christians. But Christians are a small minority among those who arrive, and they often hide that they are Christians.

Those who enter Europe are almost all Muslims, and behave as some Muslims often do in the Muslim world: they harass Christians and attack women. In reception centers, harassing Christians and attacking women are workaday incidents. European women and girls who live near reception centers are advised to take care and cover up. Rapes, assaults, stabbings and other crimes are on the rise.

European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors, by technocrats and professional politicians, in Brussels or Strasbourg.
Cultural identities in Europe have been eroded to such a point that saying that Europe is based on Judeo-Christian values has become controversial.

Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and "Islamophobia" is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.

Islam has not melted into a smooth multiculturalism; it is creating increasingly distressing problems that are almost never brought to light.

Muslim criminality across Europe is high. Consequently, the percentage of Muslims in prisons in Europe is high. In France, which has the largest Muslim population in Europe, the prison population is 70% Muslim. Many European prisons have become recruitment centers for future jihadis.

Welfare states have created a government-dependent class in Europe of many people who live permanently on social benefits. These people are often Muslim. Much of the time, they are not assimilated – and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate. Many reside in virtually autonomous, so-called no-go zones (e.g. France, the UK, and Germany).

Illegal Muslim migrants are likely to join the Muslims already living in Europe; and they will remain Muslim. They will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states. They will reside in the "no-go zones," and the "no-go zones" will continue to grow. Their occupants come from countries where Christians and women are mistreated; in Europe, they are already mistreating Christians and women.

They come from countries where Western civilization is despised and where hatred of Jews is inescapable -- and this remains so among Muslims already living in Europe. For more than two decades, almost all assaults against Jews in Europe were committed by Muslims.







The largest behavioral conditioning experiment in the history of mankind has just begun in China and, for those who value their freedoms in the West, one can only pray it never makes it here.

A citizen score system has been developed which will rate each citizen on the basis of their political views, their expression on social media, the kinds of purchases they make, and their credit scores.

These scores, ranging between 350-950, will be taken into account when handing out loans, approving travel visas, and other grants from the government.

Such scores could also be used to determine who will have access to certain types of jobs. Essentially, your life opportunities will be determined by this score.

Where this system gets even more manipulating is that the scores of one's family and friends can also affect your score, thereby ensuring a social pressure to behave in the approved manner lest it affect those you know and care about.
There will be no hiding your score from family or friends and its impact on them, as everybody will have the ability to check anyone else's score online.

Once this system is in place, the government will have a very effective method of reinforcing the kind of behavior it believes to be politically and socially correct.

The scores will be linked to China's national ID card and, while currently voluntary, the government has announced that it will be mandatory by 2020.

Opponents of a national ID system in the US will no doubt point to the Chinese system as a warning for the US of what can happen when big government and big data get together.

Since most of the big social networks and payment gateways in China are controlled by Alibaba and Tencent, the two companies have been roped in to run this citizen score system for the government.

Yahoo, an American company, is a major stockholder in Alibaba and is already a participant in this oppression of the most populous nation on earth.

This blatant abuse of power should serve as a warning to Americans who are, themselves, handing away their liberties without realizing the consequences.
Every year Americans give away more and more personal information about themselves that makes assembling a profile on them very simple.

All the information required to enable such a system here is already easily available to the government through the cooperation of the major corporations in the country.

Think about it: you are being tracked everywhere you go through software on your phones, your laptops and computers send back usage reports, advertisers have enough information about you to target their products with increasing precision and all of your personal data on social networks is being mined for whatever use deemed necessary.

Credit card companies already use numerous factors in determining your risk as a card holder. With so much data made available it will be tempting for these companies to incorporate other non-financial indicators to determine one's credit worthiness .

With more and more people dependent upon government financial aid in the United States, it is not hard to see how a government that wants more control over its citizenry might one day want to take advantage of combining political manipulation with financial benefits or lack thereof.

Christian prophecy experts make note of the fact that Revelation 13 specifically speaks of a time in the future in which the "mark of the beast" is directly connected to political support for the "Beast" or Antichrist.

One will not able to buy or sell without this mark and it is clearly a mark of loyalty and allegiance.

The merging of political allegiance and the ability to conduct commerce is clearly only beginning.






The 1st two new videos below from Gary Franchi at The Next News Network and the jerminator clearly show us the way society is quickly headed as we learn from Gary about a story in the Wall Street Journal telling us that big banks are now rejecting cash deposits while scientists are speaking out about human microchipping, telling us that they may soon become ‘non-voluntary’, as shared in the 2nd video below.

According to Franchi in the 1st video, a surprising new threat has come along to the health of big banks – large cash deposits. In an obvious move towards a cashless society, these banks are now charging customers to hold their cash for them and in doing so, JP Morgan Chase alone has cut unwanted cash deposits by more than 150 billion dollars this year by charging fees. Franchi asks why ANYONE would want to keep their money in banks where they are being charged fees when they could easily and wisely invest it in silver, gold and other precious metals (or long-term food storage for that matter.)

With big banks now moving away from cash and warnings from scientists of forced microchipping in humanity’s future, we also take a look at the 3rd video below, also from Gary at NNN, who combines these seemingly unconnected events to prove to us just how connected they really are – they are preparing to bring in the ‘mark of the beast’ system and several recent news stories outlined below and in the videos show us just how close we are.

Patriot Truther put out a ‘Beast System Update’ story today, telling us that VISA is already testing EMV biometrics in Africa and brings up a very good question, why is it that mega-corporations love to test their new technologies (vaccines, etc.) in Africa? He proceeds to answer his question by telling us that Africa has splintered government with very few laws to comply with and many Africans willingly submit themselves to be human guinea pigs if they think that they’ll get something free out of it.
We also take a look at a recent banking-related SQAlert below videos in which a reader warns us of a possible future scenario that, should it happen, will quickly leave most Americans in very deep trouble.






NATO may not be that mighty after all, according to US Navy Adm. John Richardson, who urged the alliance to update its naval strategy, at the same time raising alarm over Russia’s “growing prowess” and lamenting that it “threatens the ability of the US and its allies to operate in the Black and Baltic Seas.”


Russia has demonstrated growing prowess with its ships and demonstrated a willingness to use military coercion, The Wall Street Journal quotes US Navy Adm. John Richardson, who recently became Chief of Naval Operations, as saying at a meeting in Venice with the top naval officers of Europe.

“Their operational tempo has risen to levels not seen in over a decade,” the US Navy Chief said, sounding obviously alarmed. “Their proficiency is increasing.”
Adm. Richardson is worried that Russia may now be able to challenge US' military in “anti-access, area denial,” the newspaper said, explaining that this military term refers to “the ability of a country to restrict the US from conducting operations in a specific area.”
He therefore called on NATO to “reexamine its maritime strategy to see if it adequately describes the problem set that we have got.”





The Russian Navy has shown its true strength with small, mobile ships capable of launching cruise missiles, engaging in long-term operations and providing air support.

The US media was wrong to call Russia's military weak, as the country has been able to conduct an effective operation in Syria, former US Navy commander and Brookings Institution fellow Garrett Campbell  wrote.

"With small, inexpensive, technologically simple, and easily-produced ships, the Russian navy is displaying a unique capability and is highlighting the results of its naval modernization efforts, much of which are unknown," Campbell wrote.

Campbell also noted that the intensity of Russian airstrikes in Syria was something almost no NATO ally of the US could match, as was highlighted during the Kosovo and Libya airstrike campaigns.





Ordinary Israelis are furious about the Obama administration’s accusing Israel of committing acts of terrorism, drawing moral equivalency between the Jewish State and the terrorists who seek Israel’s destruction.
On Oct. 13, Secretary of State John Kerry suggested at a forum hosted at Harvard that Israel’s building additional residences in West Bank towns—which Israel’s opponents refer to as building settlements, carrying the connotation that Jews are “settling” land that belongs to someone else—is provoking the current wave of attacks against Israel. The following day, Kerry’s spokesman at the U.S. Department of State—John Kirby—was asked to clarify Kerry’s remarks.
Kirby was asked, “You do consider it an act of terrorism. Okay, so that would suggest then that you believe that this is—that both sides are, in fact, committing these…” Kirby cut off the questioner to respond, “Well, I would say certainly individuals on both sides of this divide are—have proven capable of, and in our view [are], guilty of acts of terror.”
Israelis whom Breitbart News talked to on the streets of Jerusalem were less than enthusiastic about the comparison.
Breitbart News also spoke with an Israeli soldier, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is not authorized to comment on U.S. policy. “That is insane,” he began. “We punish anyone who deliberately attacks innocent people, and do everything to avoid harming civilians. The Palestinians deliberately target civilians, and celebrate those who succeed.”

Elliot Chodoff, a leading Israeli counter-terrorism agent whom Breitbart News has quoted previously in this series of reports, remarked a couple days later— not in response to Kerry’s and Kirby’s words, but regarding current pressure from Washington— “The United States says Israel must show restraint, when we have had one thousand rockets fired into Israel over the past year. I wonder how America would respond if a thousand rockets were launched into New York or New Jersey.”


Shifting gears, he adds:
“Then IDF [Israeli Defense Force] responds to take out the attackers and the rocket launchers, who are launching against Israeli civilians, firing from Gaza’s schools, and hospitals, and other civilian locations, and sooner or later civilians are killed during the response—because all humans make mistakes, and war is messy, and the reality is that there are almost always unintended casualties during military operations, especially in urban settings—then the United Nations issues a statement condemning Israel for human-rights violations.




Also see:
































at

No comments:

Post a Comment