Tuesday, August 17, 2010

On the brink?

Many prophecy watchers are noticing how close the Middle East is to full-scale war, particularly as a result of Russia announcing their plans to begin loading uranium fuel into the nuclear reactor at Bushenr.

Jan Markell has published her insights on this situation:

"On the Brink?"

Something major is in the works and it is very likely not good. So many have said Iran will be "ready to go" within days as it concerns her nuclear capability that it has become a bit like crying wolf. Few pay attention anymore.

Well, you'd better listen up.

The Jerusalem Post reports that Russia will start loading uranium fuel into the nuclear reactor of the Bushehr nuclear power station in Iran on August 21. This is the crucial step in outfitting Iran with nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

Russia says the latest U.N. sanctions against Iran will not affect the Bushehr project. This project was slated to happen in late September but now we are just days away from the point of no return. Israel must decide what she will do, and quickly.

Former U.N. Ambassador John Bolton told Fox News that, "Once the fuel rods are loaded it makes it essentially immune from attack by Israel. Because once the rods are in the reactor, an attack on the reactor risks spreading radiation in the air, and perhaps into the water of the Persian Gulf."

...war is imminent for the following reasons:

1) Hizbullah has dug tunnels into northern Israel. Hizbullah also has 60,000 rockets, many with chemical warheads. Israel has delivered letters to the U.N., Lebanon, and USA, showing where Hizbullah has hidden rockets in civilian areas.

2) Israeli satellite has captured photos of submarines off-loading weapons to Hizbullah in northern Lebanon. Intelligence later showed these weapons were special chemical weapons engineered to eat through protective equipment. This agent may now be loaded onto Hizbullah rockets.

3) The Israel Air Force (IAF) is training in long- range missions, jets, and helicopters, which would suggest commando raids a long way from home. Additionally, Israeli Defense Force (IDF) reserves have been called up and are being trained at an abnormal pace.

4) Israeli subs are sitting off Iran and the Israeli Air Force (IAF) has an airbase in Saudi Arabia.

5) Israeli intelligence has captured data showing that Hizullah will preemptively attack Israel at month's end. The objective is to take out IAF bases so Israeli planes cannot hit Iran.


While at first glance Americans think this will not affect them all that much, I am taking some thoughts from my frequent radio guest, Bill Salus, who has written the book Israelestine. Salus states, "Iran's apocalyptic-minded president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has publicly threatened the closing of Hormuz in retaliation for an Israeli or American strike upon his country.

Salus continues, "Regarding the possibility of Iran playing the 'oil card' against America, on September 15, 2009 The Wall Street Journal published a Bret Stephens article entitled Obama Is Pushing Israel Towards War. In the article Stephens suggested that a Middle East War could push the price of oil up to $300 per barrel

Stephen's estimate suggests an oil-dependent world could be about to experience a spike at the pump of about four times the present amount.

And just where will America be in this scenario? Would she participate with Israel? Even Saudi Arabia is participating, by allowing Israel to use a Saudi air base. But don't count on our current White House or State Department to do anything but join the condemning chorus. As George Will says, "Will Israel do what the world won't? If it attacks Iran, the world was warned. If not, the world may regret it."


In the face of this imminent scenario, we turn to Iran's response:

"Iran Threatens 'Israel's Existence' If It Attacks"

Iran will respond if Israel attacks its first nuclear power plant, which will begin loading fuel Aug. 21, according to the Persian Gulf country's defense minister.

"In that case we will lose a power plant, but Israel's existence will be in danger," Ahmad Vahidi was cited as saying today by the state-run Mehr news agency, in response to questions about the possibility of an attack by Israel on the Russian-built atomic facility at Bushehr.

Iran has defied UN demands to cease production of enriched uranium, which can fuel a reactor or, at higher concentrations, form the core of a bomb.


And if this is all not enough, buried in the midst of the above headlines, we see the following:

"Kassam Rockets Wound Two People; IDF Has Not Yet Retaliated"

Two Israeli soldiers were wounded, one moderately and one lightly, in another Kassam missile attack on the western Negev Tuesday morning, barely 12 hours after mortar shells and rockets were fired Gaza and exploded in an open field of a kibbutz in the same area.

IDF helicopters evacuated the victims to nearby Soroka Medical Center in Be’er Sheva. Israeli media generally ignore the attacks when no one is wounded, but this time reported on the latest explosions following the news that soldiers were wounded.

The government and military adopted a policy in the past year to retaliate after every terrorist attack from Hamas-controlled Gaza, and a response is likely in the next 24 hours.

More than 115 rockets and mortars have been fired at Israelis since the beginning of 2010, and more than 400 rockets were fired from Gaza since the end of Operation Cast Lead early last year.


The region has been just on the brink for some time now, but these current revelations have taken things up another notch.

We are at a turning point.

Either Israel attacks these nuclear facilities, in which case it is quite easy to see how war will ensue --- or --- Iran has nuclear weapons, in which case they will make good on their promise to attempt to destroy Israel. The consequences of this scenario are almost unimaginable ("almost" because we know biblical prophecy and we know, ultimately, what will happen).

It's that simple.

4 comments:

  1. iran will NOT get the bomb. not yet. too soon. if iran had the bomb then they wouldnt need russia, turkey, libya...to join the coalition. isreal WILL attack, its a matter of when.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Expected ImminentlyAugust 17, 2010 at 6:48 PM

    Hello Scott
    Whenever I have seen the phrase “operation cast lead” and also think of Iran’s nuclear plant, I am reminded of Zechariah 5. Given that lead is used to contain radiation (I think)


    Vs 7,8 Here is a lead disc lifted up, and this is a woman sitting inside the basket";
    then he said, "This is Wickedness!" And he thrust her down into the basket, and threw the lead cover over its mouth.

    Vs 11 And he said to me, "To build a house for it in the land of Shinar; when it is ready, the basket will be set there on its base."

    I understand Shinar is Babylon (Iraq) but I wondered if it would still apply. What thinkest thou?

    Sue

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thats a good point Hart - plus one wonders - if they DID get the bomb they would surely use it against Israel, and we know that Israel doesn't get destroyed. So that alone makes me wonder if they will ever get the bomb.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Sue.

    Hmmm.....Thats interesting and the first time I have considered that. I want to go back and look at those scriptures and the hebrew roots etc...But I am compelled to go track this down - most definitely

    ReplyDelete