who turn broadcasted it to the entire world. Although the Post hasn’t divulged the minute specifics of this classified information, the outlet did state the following:,
The other disturbing aspect of this Washington Post story is that
No matter how much the media desperately tries to get people to focus away from the murder of Seth Rich and make false claims that the parents don’t want the hunt for his killer, Rich’s parents are very thankful for those helping to find his killer. Kim Dotcom who claims to know Seth Rich will have a public statement released on Tuesday, though we don’t know if he will have any bombshells related to Seth Rich. What we do have is a video statement released by Seth Rich’s parents a couple of weeks ago, thanking people on the Internet for help finding the killer of their son.
Despite media censorship: Seth Rich parents thank people for help finding son’s killer
The MEDIA is lying about Seth Rich saying #SethRich parents want this to stop. Here's a video from his parents THANKING the internet! pic.twitter.com/9w96tOhj37
— Red Pill (@RedPillDropper) May 20, 2017
The media can lie and obfuscate all they want. It’s no coincidence that once the story about Seth Rich’s murder came up again last weekend, the so called “leaks” from the Washington Post and New York Times began. The Democrats and Hillary Clinton are trying to hide something regarding the murder of Seth Rich. The only way they know how is to illegally leak information to these two failing newspaper in hope of drawing American’s attention to the so called Russian collusion that doesn’t even exist.
The truth on Seth Rich’s murder will come out, and his parents will have some sort of vindication. But until it does, the media and Democrats are going to do whatever they can to avoid covering the story of Seth Rich and his mysterious murder last July.
Last August, Wikileaks founder Julian Assange implied that Rich was the Wikileaks source for the release of tens of thousands of DNC emails that were released.
In speaking of Rich's murder and making the suggestion, Assange said, "We have to understand how high the stakes are in the United States."
Rod Wheeler, a former DC homicide investigator told Fox News, “My investigation up to this point shows there was some degree of email exchange between Seth Rich and WikiLeaks. I do believe that the answers to who murdered Seth Rich sits on his computer on a shelf at the DC police or FBI headquarters.”
“The police department nor the FBI have been forthcoming,” Wheeler told Fox 5 DC. “They haven’t been cooperating at all. I believe that the answer to solving his death lies on that computer, which I believe is either at the police department or either at the FBI. I have been told both.”
WikiLeaks never divulges the names of the people who provide them with information. Even so, Assange has not only shown an active interest in the Seth Rich case, but also offered a $20,000 reward for anyone providing information leading to the arrest and conviction of Rich’s murder. Why? And why did he post a link to the Fox News article on his Twitter account on Tuesday?
I don’t know, but if I worked for the FBI or the Washington Post, I’d sure as hell be beating the bushes to find out. And not just because it might help in Rich’s murder investigation, but also, because it could shed light on the Russia fiasco which is being used to lay the groundwork for impeachment proceedings. So any information that challenges the government version of events, could actually change
Have you ever heard of Craig Murray?
Murray should be the government’s star witness in the DNC hacking scandal, instead, no one even knows who he is. But if we trust what Murray has to say, then we can see that the Russia hacking story is baloney. The emails were “leaked” by insiders not “hacked” by a foreign government. Here’s the scoop from Robert Parry at Consortium News:
“Former British Ambassador to Uzbekistan Craig Murray, has suggested that the DNC leak came from a “disgruntled” Democrat upset with the DNC’s sandbagging of the Sanders campaign and that the Podesta leak came from the U.S. intelligence community….He (Murray) appears to have undertaken a mission for WikiLeaks to contact one of the sources (or a representative) during a Sept. 25 visit to Washington where he says he met with a person in a wooded area of American University. ….
Though Murray has declined to say exactly what the meeting in the woods was about, he may have been passing along messages about ways to protect the source from possible retaliation, maybe even an extraction plan if the source was in some legal or physical danger…Murray also suggested that the DNC leak and the Podesta leak came from two different sources, neither of them the Russian government.
“The Podesta emails and the DNC emails are, of course, two separate things and we shouldn’t conclude that they both have the same source,” Murray said. “In both cases we’re talking of a leak, not a hack, in that the person who was responsible for getting that information out had legal access to that information…
Scott Horton then asked, “Is it fair to say that you’re saying that the Podesta leak came from inside the intelligence services, NSA [the electronic spying National Security Agency] or another agency?”
“I think what I said was certainly compatible with that kind of interpretation, yeah,” Murray responded. “In both cases they are leaks by Americans.”
With all the hullabaloo surrounding the Russia hacking case, you’d think that Murray’s eyewitness account would be headline news, but not in Homeland Amerika where the truth is kept as far from the front page as humanly possible.
Bottom line: The government has a reliable witness (Murray) who can positively identify the person who hacked the DNC emails and, so far, they’ve showed no interest in his testimony at all. Doesn’t that strike you as a bit weird?