The United States finds its increasingly clumsy, circular foreign policy looping back once again to accusations of “weapons of mass destruction” being inexplicably used against a civilian population, this time in Syria’s northern city of Idlib currently serving as the defacto capital of terrorist organizations including various Al Qaeda affiliates, most notably the US State Department designated foreign terrorist organization, al-Nusrah Front.
The allegations have already been used for a rushed US attack on Syrian forces, without any formal investigation or approval from the United Nations.
There are several serious factors being intentionally omitted from this quickly evolving US-driven narrative, including:
- While the eastern Syrian city of Raqqa serves as the defacto capital of the Islamic State, the northern city of Idlib serves as the defacto capital for all remaining Al Qaeda affiliates in the country;
- The Syrian government is already winning nationwide using much more effective, conventional tactics and weapon systems. Syria is also under immense scrutiny, thus using chemical weapons would be an egregious tactical, strategic, political and military blunder, serving no purpose besides to incriminate the government and invite US-led foreign intervention;
- The US has already prepositioned troops in Syria, increasing their number recently and expanding the scope of their operations. It is not a coincidence that they were placed there to exert greater military force against Damascus, and now suddenly have a pretext to do so;
- The US has a long and sordid history of arraying false accusations against targeted states, specifically regarding the possession or use of chemical weapons and;
- Militant groups the US and its allies are currently arming, funding, training and providing aid to, have been caught staging serial chemical weapon attacks or fabricating evidence regarding alleged attacks that never took place.
The allegations of the most recent attack come from the same chorus of US-European backed organizations, fronts and media platforms that have repeatedly made similar accusations over the past six years, none of which have been verified with evidence, and with several instances being exposed as staged by militant groups themselves fighting the Syrian government.
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh, who exposed plans to use militant groups associated with Al Qaeda to overthrow the Syrian government as early as 2007, would publish another report in 2014 titled, “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” which would explain:
Obama’s change of mind had its origins at Porton Down, the defence laboratory in Wiltshire. British intelligence had obtained a sample of the sarin used in the 21 August attack and analysis demonstrated that the gas used didn’t match the batches known to exist in the Syrian army’s chemical weapons arsenal.
The message that the case against Syria wouldn’t hold up was quickly relayed to the US joint chiefs of staff. The British report heightened doubts inside the Pentagon; the joint chiefs were already preparing to warn Obama that his plans for a far-reaching bomb and missile attack on Syria’s infrastructure could lead to a wider war in the Middle East. As a consequence the American officers delivered a last-minute caution to the president, which, in their view, eventually led to his cancelling the attack.
Hersh would also reveal that intelligence assessments from within the US itself noted that militant groups, not the Syrian government, were the most likely culprits behind serial chemical attacks unfolding across Syrian territory:
The Syrian government’s use of chemical weapons, when its efforts to restore order across the nation are already successfully being executed using far more effective conventional means, and as it does so under the scrutiny of an “international order” led by the US eager to justify the direct use of US military might against Damascus would be absolutely inexplicable.
The US-European media sources attempting to ratchet up the narrative implicating the Syrian government have conveniently left out whatever motive would have been behind this pointless, ineffective, and provocative use of chemical weapons the UN itself has already confirmed the government turned over years ago.
Playing the part of Bush-Obama, is current US President Donald Trump, who, like Bush-Obama ran on a platform of reversing dangerous and unpopular US foreign interventions, but who is now entirely backtracking on campaign promises and has become merely the latest to take up the regime change torch.
Trump, like Obama and Bush before him, has omitted any substantial evidence implicating the Syrian government, and like his predecessors, he is attempting to rush the nation and its allies into a course of action before evidence and reason can be applied to unraveling the events surrounding this latest incident.
Also omitted from the Trump administration’s rhetoric, as well as that of voices across US-European media, is the fact that Idlib is the defacto capital of Al Qaeda affiliates. In other words, the US is attempting to rush into action in defense of one of the last remaining, and now endangered bastions of Al Qaeda in Syria.
With US missiles already sailing into Syrian military targets and as the US attempts to stampede the world into further action, even notoriously dishonest propagators of US propaganda, including the Associated Press, have aired doubts about the latest attack. In AP’s aforementioned article, it also states:
AP also claims that “witnesses” saw Syrian and Russian jets engaged in the alleged attacks. Russia’s motivation for deploying chemical weapons across a battlefield it has utterly frustrated America’s agenda upon defies logic and reason.
A US-sponsored, staged attack, however, makes perfect sense and fits well into a pattern of deceit, murder and mayhem that has punctuated virtually all aspects of modern American foreign policy. Even as the repercussions of American deceit versus Iraq continue to unfold in cities like Mosul, the US appears poised to predicate another entire war and the destruction of another entire nation on tales of “weapons of mass destruction.”
This just in. According to mainstream media president Trump, even if for a day, is no longer Hitler. He is no longer a threat to the world now that the Trump administration has been officially compromised by the Neocon war hawks who have been (along with their partners on the Liberal Left) trying to undermine Trump since day one. It is important for people to see that the recently reported missile attack on a Syrian airbase is entirely contrary to the recent commitment by the US to not call for Assad’s stepping down. If you are a Trump supporter or someone trying to make sense of all this you may be thinking, huh? What’s going on? And, false flag alert!
All of this is completely normal nowadays, however, with the ongoing JFK-style internal struggle for the undermining of the Trump administration; a struggle that marks an administration which is becoming known for all of its 180-degree turns. One day Trump announces his desire to break away from NATO, another day VP Pence tells the EU of the US commitment to NATO. One day Trump says he wants to be friends with Russia, then the mainstream media and the Neocons attacks him for this so he later mysteriously changes his position. One minute threatening rhetoric comes out saying “Iran is on notice” only to see nothing happen over the coming months.
And now after Syrian president Bashar al Assad is officially declared a non-threat, all of a sudden we see a chemical weapons (false flag?) attack accusation blamed on Assad which apparently justifies a new attitude toward Assad and a missile being fired into a Syrian position. Notice that as opposed to the old Iraq “weapons of mass destruction” accusation, there apparently was no need to investigate the nature of this “attack.” Now it is apparently sufficient and justified to go straight for the counterattack missile strike without any need to prove to the world anything.
I suppose the main point or the more important point I want to make about this recent development regardless of what direction this goes is that now
Note to the Liberal Left: if Trump continues aggression in Syria or anywhere in the Middle East and aligns himself with the globalists, all of a sudden all of your (“social justice warrior”) criticism of Trump will be labeled “conspiracies” by the very same mainstream media that had been bashing Trump up to now for not cooperating with the globalist agenda.
If nothing else comes out of this, I hope that people see the political nature of the world we live in. There is a ruling class that intends to implement their new world order as soon as they can and they will not let any president or anyone get in the way of this plan.
They want to rule over you and they hate the individual, they hate all religions, traditional values and cultures, they hate nation states with an enforceable rule of law that gets in their way, and they hate freedom, free speech and the concept of a free press (think alternative media). All of these are threats to their plans and the mainstream media today including the social media giants today (Facebook, YouTube) more than any other entity is tasked with pushing this globalization and new world order plan forward regardless of what it takes. As I urge viewers in the video below, if you forget politicians and just
For CNN, it took a war and pointed, globalist "rhetoric" for Trump to become President of the United States. Per CNN host Fareed Zakaria on "New Day" this morning: