Many are suggesting that the United States is being targeted as well, and that a major attack is in the works.
The Daily Caller reports:
The likely response will be more security and police state measures, though there may be little that such heavy handed maneuvers can accomplish.
In order to instill the maximum sense of terror, ISIS members are believed to be targeting random venues that don't necessarily have any significance to the governments involved, but do inflict significant numbers of casualties:
With another round of holidays fast approaching in the shadows of last Friday’s Paris attacks, FBI officials on the front lines of the war on terrorism see a new round of threats rising and worry they don’t have all the tools to cope, according to interviews with The Washington Times.
Bureau officials are deeply worried they don’t have enough resources to track a growing number of radicalized Americans inspired by the Islamic State, with more possibly entering as President Obama opens the borders to thousands of Syrian refugees.
Rep. Blake Farenthold, Texas Republican and a member of both of the House Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform Committees, told a Washington Times radio show Tuesday that the U.S. government does not have the resources to screen a new wave of Syrian refugees for terror ties as the administration has promised.
Added another official: “The administration has a calming public storyline that we have this all under control and life can go on as normal. But we’re one crack in the sidewalk away from a tragedy, and that crack could be an encrypted message we can’t follow, a lead we couldn’t resource or a refugee who slips in like we saw in Paris.”
We've learned some important things about the attacks and the attackers of the Paris massacre. We've learned that ISIS, evidently, either coordinated the attacks or granted operational authority to what I've coined Wilayat Paris. And it appears the coordination efforts came through Belgium, where at least two of the radical Islamists have been discovered to be from the same neighborhood.
Some have asked why they have waited until now to strike. Terrorists have been threatening for years that they plan to attack us and Europe—virtually since its forming, the new ISIS caliphate has been threatening attacks. So what's taken so long?
Well, Europe, and, to a lesser extent, America have many majority Muslim regions. They've been coming for years and settling in major cities across Europe. Anyone who understands "Civilization Jihad" knows this is how radical Islam has always intended to conquer the West.
These Muslim refugees are certainly not all escaping the fight. They are, in fact, an ISIS Trojan Horse. They prey on the sympathy and empathy of the West – knowing full well where the soft targets are – the easy marks. The Palestinian terrorists have been doing it to Israel for decades – faking casualties and funerals and blaming the "carnage" on ruthless Israeli attacks. And we in West predictably fall for the theatre every time.
So where are the jihadists settling? They are heading for Europe's many No-Go Zones, of which the left likes to deny the existence. And this is where at least two of the Paris jihadists were from – a neighborhood in Brussels, Belgium, known as Molenbeek.
These "No-Go Zones" are run as virtual States within a State, where those of other denominations are unwelcome (to say the least), Sharia Law trumps all, and even police don't venture in, unless en masse. There are many of these zones, such as those in Germany, Sweden, Belgium, France, and the U.K., where some may recognize names like Tower Hamlets and Waltham Forest.
Many have said we must fight them over there so we avoid fighting them here, but that ship has sailed. As I said, many are already here, and if Obama has his way, thousands more will be arriving soon.
I believe ISIS has taken this long to "kick off" attacks in order to martial sufficient forces in several regions to wreak havoc on the West. Their leadership has, evidently, concluded they have enough to begin.
Marine Le Pen, the leader of Front Nationale Party in France, has been a bulwark against the Muslims invasion of her country. Yet, now, she is not only standing against a Muslim invasion, but also pushing for her country to be re-armed in light of the Muslim threat.
Le Pen not only said that Islam must be "eradicated" from France, but also that "further demanded that border controls be made 'permanent' and binational Islamists must be deprived of their French passport."
Le Pen stated, "France was given the vulnerable; it must re-arm because for too long suffered a collapse of its scheduled protection and defense capabilities, face yet predictable threats is growing."
Here's the real issue that neither Hollande nor Le Pen are addressing: The arming of its citizens. There is no doubt in my mind that armed citizens in the areas of jihad attack in Paris would have been able to stop the bloodshed. I am not saying there would not have been bloodshed, but it would have been extremely limited due to an armed citizenry.
Let me be blunt: France, you succumbed to what you did on Friday because you allowed your government to infringe on your right, yes your duty, to defend yourself and your neighbors. And why? It was because you bought into the lie that your government can provide security for you. They cannot.
They are cancelling games all over Europe. Another arena was also evacuated before a concert, and a train station was also shut down.
in Hannover, Germany, a German newspaper reported.
The truck disguised as a rescue vehicle was found before the German national team was set to play Netherlands on Tuesday, which led to the evacuation of the HD Arena and the cancellation of the game.
“The main thing that I’ve been trying to communicate over the last several of these horrific episodes is that, contrary to popular belief, Americans are not more violent than people in other developed countries,” Mr. Obama said. “But they have more deadly weapons to act out their rage.”
Asked by interviewer Bill Simmons of HBO if gun control will be the “dominant” issue on his agenda next year, Mr. Obama replied, “I hope so.”
The number “10,000 Syrian refugees” is being thrown around a lot by the mainstream media, but did you know that Barack Obama has actually publicly declared that the U.S. is going to take in 100,000 refugees from Syria and elsewhere for each of the next two years? That is an absolutely massive number, and it is inevitable that some jihadists will slip through the vetting process. As Syrian refugees enter the United States, they are being dispersed all around the country. In my article yesterday, I explained that the State Department has established refugee processing centers in 48 U.S. states. But instead of the “trickle” of refugees the mainstream media is talking about, the truth is that it is going to be more like a flood. The following is a message that was tweeted by Barack Obama’s official Twitter account on September 28th…
The Obama administration is moving by opening new screening outposts in Iraq and Lebanon, administration officials told Reuters on Friday.
That same article quoted an Obama administration official as saying that they wanted to “push out really ambitious goals” for the number of Syrian refugees being brought in…
Russia hits 206 ISIS targets in Syria after confirming bomb downed passenger plane over Sinai — RT News