Thursday, July 30, 2015

Creeping Totalitarianism: The War On Suburbia, UN: Gov't Must Control Private Schools Because Of 'Human Rights'




Hundreds Of Documents Have Been Seized And They Reveal That Turkey Is Most definitely Working With ISIS In Killing Christians


Hundreds of documents have been seized and they reveal that Turkey most definitely has been working with ISIS in killing Christians. According to the report:

A senior Western official claimed that information gathered at the compound of Abu Sayyaf, the individual responsible for oil smuggling operations on behalf of the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) who was killed in a US commando operation a few months ago, points to high-level contacts between Turkish officials and leading ISIL members, the Guardian newspaper in the UK has recently reported.

The recent revelation appears to be the first public criticism of Turkey’s approach and could complicate Ankara’s relations with its Western allies.

One senior Western official familiar with the intelligence found at the compound told the Guardian that “direct dealings between Turkish officials and ranking Isis [ISIL] members was now ‘undeniable.'”

The Guardian report continues: “‘There are hundreds of flash drives and documents that were seized there,’ the official told the Observer. ‘They are being analyzed at the moment, but the links are already so clear that they could end up having profound policy implications for the relationship between us and Ankara.'”

Turkey’s plan to invade its neighboring country of Syria was uncovered last year when a secret recording leaked of the highest officials discussing a plan to launch a military aggression on Syria by using the armed terrorist group Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS). The launched invasion resulted on aggression against the Armenian city of Kessab in which 80 Armenians were massacred as a result.
The recording shows that Erdogan’s government was orchestrating an unprecedented military aggression against Syria since last Saturday when Turkish tanks and artillery shelled the Syrian lands to provide a cover for armed terrorist groups to enter Syria from Turkey which the recordings prove beyond doubt.

Turkey is not really fighting ISIS, regardless of anyone says. ISIS is the face of terrorism, and Turkey is the one pulling the strings, only acting as though they are fighting terrorism. 






Few of us understand patient gradualism. We live and have our being within a few years and mostly in an unconscious automated state of mind.
But people in power are long-term planners. They absolutely understand human nature and how to channel it to the evolution and refinement of the authoritarian state.
Authoritarianism is based on long-term planning. Authoritarianism is a philosophy of collectivism. Some call it democracy. Some call it communism. Some call it fascism. Some call it National Socialism. But whatever you call it, it is all collectivism or authoritarianism; and in its ultimate form it is globalism.
The goal is perfect docility and perfect harmony with authoritarianism (economic, social and spiritual). Until the people accept collectivism under some pretext, they are not docile and completely subdued. Once they do, rebellion and confrontation are impossible. This is the ultimate goal of the globalists, and the American system is nearing this state.

As I told you last week in “Why is the war on the Confederacy still going on today?,” the dismantling of the middle class has become the appointed, full-time task of the largest government alphabet soup agencies and Wall Street on behalf of globalism. The purpose behind this is that if those big middle-class producers and consumers can be decimated once and for all, then they can join the ranks of low-wage workers and more readily accept government largess and, thereby, become “hooked” on collectivism.

Collectivism is a certain means of social, economic and religious control. Politicians regularly espouse individualism, human liberty and democracy at the same time. Impossible! Individualism and human liberty are opposite to democracy and any other form of collectivism. The collectivist mentality or the mass collective mind is the spirit of the New World Order.
But something is standing in the way. Despite the years of indoctrination through the public (non)education system and mass programming by the national propaganda media and public (i.e., government) policy, rural Middle and Southern middle-class Americans — the “Red States” of “flyover country” — continue to resist the globalists’ dreams of a socialist/Marxist “utopia” and egalitarianism. That’s because they are, by and large, more independent and more self-reliant and also demand equitable reward for their labor and product, placing them in competition for resources and goods with the global elite.

Efforts to remove this obstacle are behind the current war on the middle class and individual liberty and the spirit of individualism through the attempts to whitewash Southern culture from existence and distort the true nature of the Confederate cause by casting it and Confederate symbols as racist and treasonous. The bigoted elites in the District of Criminals and pointy-headed “thinkers” in the prestigious institutes of learning continually promulgate the meme that whites — rural whites in particular and Southern whites specifically — are backward, racist buffoons riding in trucks looking for blacks to lynch while ridiculously clinging to their guns and religion.

The purpose is to stir up racial animosity and manipulate the people against one another. Manipulating minorities who are naturally drawn to socialism is basic political strategy to cover government crime and justify government politics and plunder.
The principle of government is that political power is maximized by forcibly leveling every individual to the same status of conformity, collectivism, egalitarianism and serfdom.
Last summer, there was an invasion of illegals from Central and South America stemming from the immigration policies and statements of President Barack Obama. Over the ensuing months, the Obama regime shipped those illegals into communities and cities across the country and immediately began efforts to grant them some sort of legal status in order to ultimately provide them with voting rights in a back-door effort to change the local demographics and, therefore, the voting outcomes in these communities from a conservative bent to one more socialistic.
Third World immigrants are attracted to cradle-to-grave nanny state socialism because it is what they know and all they have known. They are also more accepting of gun control and the police state. They have no understanding of or experience with individual liberty or the concept of natural rights.

Gaining voting “rights” for non-citizens is the main driver of the federal opposition to voter ID laws.

The Obama regime attempted but failed with a mass social re-engineering scheme in 2010. That effort, fueled by corruptocrat Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.), sought to fulfill the United Nation’s Agenda 21 plan, adopted at the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992 and signed onto by “New World Order” President George H.W. Bush.

Now comes Obama’s speciously titled Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing edicts from the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This extra-constitutional rule change has been in the works for more than two years, but has been largely glossed over by the MSM. It seeks to do the reverse of the Dodd bill. That is, rather than drive the suburbanites into the cities, it seeks to move inner-city minorities into the suburbs.

The AFFH will have the federal government imposing preferred racial and ethnic composition on neighborhoods in exchange for federal funds provided or denied. It will change zoning laws, require a certain amount of government-subsidized housing in rural areas in order to achieve “racial balance,” control transportation and business development and remove the authority of state and local governments in the areas of zoning, transportation and education.

To accomplish its goals, HUD will dig into the racial balance ZIP code by ZIP code looking for areas of segregation, with the segregation threshold being nonwhite populations of 50 percent or more.Federally funded cities deemed overly segregated will be pressured to change their zoning laws to allow construction of more subsidized housing in affluent areas in the suburbs and relocate inner-city minorities to those predominantly white areas. HUD’s maps, which use dots to show the racial distribution or density in residential areas, will be used to select affordable-housing sites, according to the New York Post.

To employ this policy, the federal government has undertaken a massive Orwellian-style data collection initiative, prying into the medical records, credit card purchases, mortgage business records, IRS filings, employment records, educational records and local government policy initiatives searching for racial “inequalities” for the Justice Department to prosecute.

The only way to resist this tyranny is for local governments to eschew all federal monies including Community Development Block Grants going forward. Of course, local residents always pressure their community leaders to accept government monies under the auspices that they have paid their “taxes” and want a return on their “investment.” But once the Feds get their hooks into the local community through the distribution of money from the federal treasury, they can exert total control over local government’s functions regarding housing, zoning and regulations far more than they do already.
The globalist agenda is the most comprehensive program for world fascism and world collectivism ever conceived. Its basis is esoteric deception, as carried out pragmatically by mass politics, international mass banking and the mass media. It operates as a whole — as an organism. Today’s democratic globalists make the communists and the Nazis look like amateur totalitarians.




The United Nations Wants its member states, mostly dictatorships and repressive regimes to clamp down
hard on educational freedom under the guise of "human rights." Concerned that students in private schools 
around the world are not receiving sufficient doses of globalist indoctrination prescribed by various global
agreements, the dictator-dominated UN "Human Rights Council" passed a resolution this month calling
on governments worldwide to "monitor" and "regulate" non-governmental education. Governments and
dictators should also impose "standards" on private schools, the UN bureaucrats and government 
representatives said in the deeply controversial document. 


Incredibly, the resolution even speaks of “protecting education from commercialization.” 
What it really means, of course, is protecting government-run monopoly “education” from competition by superior providers. 
After all, why would parents spend money on a private school if the tax-funded “education” provided by government was
 just as good or better? Obviously they would not. So what the UN pseudo-human rights bureaucracy is really saying is 
governments must prevent parents from choosing better alternatives. Of course, following the prescriptions outlined by
 Karl Marx, some members of the UN body actually ban any forms of non-government-run education already.


mischaracterized as “human rights.” Continuing with its long tradition, the body urged governments to “fulfil the right to education” 
by, among other schemes, “putting in place a regulatory framework guided by international human rights obligations for 
education providers that establishes, inter alia,  minimum norms and standards for the creation and operation of 
educational institutions.”
It was not immediately clear what sort of “standards” and “norms” the UN outfit had in mind — 
Nor was it clear how usurping control over private and alternative schools to conform with purported 
“international human rights obligations” would contribute to a better education. In fact, proper education does 
not seem to be the goal at  all, as made clear by a growing deluge of UN documents, resolutions, and other 
schemes demanding that schools worldwide indoctrinate children into new “values,” “attitudes,” “beliefs,” “sustainability,” 
and “global citizenship.”  
The latest UN resolution on education, approved in Geneva on July 1, also calls for governments and dictators to 
start “monitoring private education providers” and “holding accountable those whose practices have a negative
 impact on the enjoyment of the right to education.” Setting aside the fact that education is a service and a privilege, 
not a right — real rights, by definition, mean freedom from coercion, not compulsory “services” from government — 
the resolution did not make clear what sorts of “practices” the UN and its members believe have a “negative impact” on “the  enjoyment  of  the  right  to  education.”
Also in the resolution was a call for governments to use tax funds to support “research” (read: biased “studies” 
touting government education) and “awareness-raising activities” (read: propaganda touting government education) 
on the issue. Supposedly, the “research” and “awareness” should help “better understand the wide-ranging impact of the commercialization of education on the enjoyment of the right to education.” Of course, a mountain of research on the
 topic is already available, and it shows that government-run schools exist to serve government — and that private schools, homeschooling, and other alternatives are drastically superior to “public” education, generally at a fraction of the cost.  
The UN also “calls upon all relevant stakeholders [governments, the UN, government-funded ‘civil society’ groups, 
regional outfits such as the European Union, etc] to ensure that the post-2015 development agenda fosters the
 universal realization of the right to education, including by establishing education targets that are specific, 
measurable, realistic and relevant,” the resolution said. The document did not specify what sort of “education targets”
 it had in mind. But based on previous UN education schemes, indoctrination targets would have been a better term to 
describe the agenda.    
Indeed, in the same resolution, the UN “Human Rights” Council applauded another UN organ, the UN Educational, 
Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), which has been at the forefront of pushing the extreme ideologies of 
globalism and statism through schools worldwide. “The UNESCO-led UN Decade of Education for Sustainable 
Development, which began in 2005, was explicitly intended to instill in every human being ‘the knowledge, skills, 
attitudes, and values necessary to shape a sustainable future,’” UNESCO chief Irina Bokova, a Bulgarian communist
boasted in a recent column. Read that again.
“What is needed now is a global movement, with every student in every country learning about sustainable development 
from well-trained teachers, equipped with the appropriate curricula and resources,” Bokova continued, with
 “sustainable development” meaning a radical redesign of human society toward collectivism, central planning, 
humanism, population control, and global governance. In the same piece, Bokova bragged that her agency, 
which she regularly boasts promotes global humanism, was also “promoting climate-change education in schools.”   
As long as there are private schools outside the control of UN member governments and dictators, there will always 
be children whose “attitudes and values” are not shaped by the accelerating indoctrination efforts. Hence, under the
 guise of “human rights,” many of the UN’s most totalitarian and brutal member regimes demanded in the resolution 
that private schools be brought under government control. If private education negatively affects the “human right to 
education,” though, do privately owned grocery stores negatively affect the “human right to food”? Murderous
 communist dictator Raul Castro, whose regime sits on the UN “Human Rights” Council behind the resolution, 
may think so. But for anyone who appreciates liberty and prosperity, the answer is obvious.  
If the collection of mass-murderers and tyrants on the UN council was not itself enough evidence of the UN’s warped 
view of “human rights,” a brief examination of its scheming provides plenty more. Indeed, the UN’s “human rights” are
notions of human rights. Under the UN’s version of human rights, “rights” come not from God, but from governments, 
treaties, and international organizations. They can also be restricted or abolished by government at will under virtually 
any pretext, as the UN’s own “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” openly admits. And in no case may those alleged
 “rights” be used contrary to the “purposes and principles” of the UN, according to Article 29. In other words, 
you have no rights under UN “human rights.”

Ironically, though, the UN resolution demanding government control over all forms of education would appear to 
violate the UN’s own “Universal Declaration of [pseudo-] Human Rights.” For example, that document clearly 
states in Article 26 that “Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.” 
If parents have the right to choose what kind of education their children will receive, how can the UN “human rights” 
apparatus demand that governments decide what kind of education private schools of parents’ choosing will provide to 
children? The same article in the UN declaration also states that education “shall further the activities of the United Nations.”    
While the UN resolution passed almost entirely unnoticed in the world press, it did have some supporters other than the 
mostly autocratic regimes on the UN “Human Rights” Council. A massive coalition of Astroturf “education” groups — 
some of which openly say they want government school to be made compulsory for all — celebrated the measure, too.
 “The rapid, unregulated growth of private providers of education is already creating — and enabling — violations of the 
right to education, threatening to erase the last 50 years of progress in access to education,” argued Camilla Croso
 with the Global Campaign for Education in a statement. “This resolution shows that States have realized that they 
must act now to regulate such providers — before it is too late.”
In the real world, however, the expansion of educational liberty and the diminishing role of government schools in 
some areas of the world ought to be celebrated. The UN and its member governments around the world have
It is time for the U.S. to withdraw from the UN dictators club, defund it, and get the federal government out of alll 
education once and for all.






A temporary restraining order has been issued preventing an anti-abortion group from releasing any video of leaders of a California company that provides fetal tissue to researchers. The group is the same one that previously released three covertly shot videos of a Planned Parenthood leader discussing the sale of aborted fetuses for research.
The Los Angeles Superior Court order issued Tuesday prohibits the Center for Medical Progress from releasing any video of three high-ranking StemExpress officials taken at a restaurant in May. It appears to be the first legal action prohibiting the release of a video from the organization.





The group behind the release of recent undercover videos which purport to show Planned Parenthood employees discussing the sale of aborted fetus parts issued a statement Wednesday after a court barred the release of some new footage.
The Los Angeles Superior Court ruled Tuesday that the Center for Medical Progress is prohibited from releasing footage taken at a restaurant in May of high-ranking officials from StemExpress.
StemExpress is a group that provides human tissue to researchers and has a history of working with Planned Parenthood.


In a statement, the Center for Medical Progress blasted StemExpress and accused them of attempting to “suppress free speech.”
Here’s the full statement:
StemExpress, a for-profit company partnered with over 30 abortion clinics, including Planned Parenthood, to harvest and sell aborted baby parts and provide a “financial benefit” to Planned Parenthood clinics, is attempting to use meritless litigation to cover-up this illegal baby parts trade, suppress free speech, and silence the citizen press reporting on issues of burning concern to the American public. They are not succeeding—their initial petition was rejected by the court, and their second petition was eviscerated to a narrow and contingent order about an alleged recording pending CMP’s opportunity to respond. The Center for Medical Progress follows all applicable laws in the course of our investigative journalism work and will contest all attempts from Planned Parenthood and their allies to silence our First Amendment rights and suppress investigative journalism.

On Wednesday, David Daleiden of the Center for Medical Progress appeared on TheBlaze TV’s “Dana” and called for Planned Parenthood to disclose how much it has profited from its practice.

“We don’t have a good way of knowing because Planned Parenthood’s baby part sales are buried so deep down within their organization that some of the national leadership of Planned Parenthood doesn’t even fully know the scope of it,” he said. “The national office has for many years now chosen to have a ‘don’t ask don’t tell’ policy about the fetal tissue sales of the affiliates in order to … keep themselves insulated it from it legally, even though they’re still aware of it.”













Also see:


































6 comments:

Peter said...

People thought Erdogan was down for the count....but don't count him out.

Put the pieces together: We stir unrest in the Middle East in 2011, we pull out and allow ISIS to be created, we give Iran sanctions relief and path to the bomb, we screw Israel, and we let Turkey use ISIS as their junkyard dog. If Daniel 8 is future, we're right on the verge. And Daniel 11 is not far behind, with Egypt quaking in their boots. Oh, good thing we just delivered jets to Egypt: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-transfer-8-f-16-fighter-jets-egypt-ahead-strategic-dialogue-1477826017

Look at the Middle East. All of the pieces are there. EVERY nation that is named in the OT for judgment (and confirmed in composite beast in Revelation 17) is a Muslim nation surrounding Israel.

Scott said...

Completely agree. Its coming very fast right now

Mike Lupica said...

DANIEL is were we will rest...That's a promise

Mike Lupica said...

And Daniel is were we are at....................................

Waterer said...

Was looking at the earthquake reports from a few posts ago and googled the question:Are Eq's increasing. Saw this http://www.sott.net/article/281068-Earthquake-frequency-increasing-Rate-of-strong-quakes-doubles-in-2014

Scott said...

Very interesting- link - I may post this article -