A draft resolution calling for Palestinian statehood and a full Israeli withdrawal to the country’s pre-1967 lines within two years may be brought to the UN Security Council as early as Wednesday, a Palestinian official told the Times of Israel Tuesday. The official, who spoke under condition of anonymity, said Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas was expected to authorize the Palestinian delegation to the UN to launch the diplomatic initiative shortly. The resolution would likely be submitted by Jordan.
Earlier, an unnamed Palestinian official described a meeting in London between chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat and US Secretary of State John Kerry on Tuesday as “difficult.” During the meeting, Kerry asked the Palestinian delegation not to rush ahead with the demand for a two-year timetable, and, according to the source, indicated the US would veto the resolution at the Security Council if it called for a timetable for Israel’s withdrawal, Ynet reported. The US position is not to automatically veto any resolution, the report said, but it will veto a resolution that seeks to determine the result of negotiations before those negotiations are concluded.
Erekat reportedly told Kerry that Israel’s attitude to the Palestinians had left them no choice but to seek statehood via the UN, and said that if the US vetoed the resolution they would seek to join numerous UN and other international organizations en route to statehood.
Fatah central committee member Mohammad Shtayyeh also said Tuesday that Palestinian and French officials were coordinating and putting final touches on their own UN resolution, the Palestinian Ma’an news agency reported.
On Monday, Erekat told a Nazareth-based radio station that Palestinians have yet to secure the necessary nine votes from the 15-member council, according to Haaretz.
Kerry’s Tuesday meeting with Erekat came a day after the secretary’s conversation in Rome with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who took a hard line against both Palestinian and French proposals for UN-mandated parameters and timelines for a two-state solution.
But even with Putin's extremely visible and frightening track record before us, it's clear the Obama administration and even the investment community is still not prepared for the extent of the damage the Russian leader can unleash on his own people, on his neighbors, and on the U.S. financial markets.
There is nothing more dangerous than a wounded animal. Vladimir Putin is wounded — and he's not known for holding back.
For all we know, Putin has already done a lot of the following things, but here's just a partial list:
Cut off energy supplies to the rest of Europe
Launch an all-out cyber war on Western and U.S. companies and government agencies
Nationalize foreign-owned or -controlled businesses inside Russia
Most of the discussions about Russia's ability to drag our markets down centered around the Ukraine crisis earlier this year, with little talk about the overall stability of the nation and Kremlin itself. Only people like Hermitage Capital CEO Bill Browder took the appropriate tone when he started sounding the alarm bells in 2006 about Putin's corrupt government and accomplices in the domestic Russian business world.
I'm still not sure that enough people in Washington and on Wall Street have yet grasped this reality: Romney was right. Browder was right. There is almost nothing Putin hasn't already done to stay in power already.
Just imagine what he'll do now that he's been poked with a very sharp stick.